green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Standard Petroleum Co. v. Faugno Acquisition, LLC
See Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky , 72 Conn. App. 700 , 718, 807 A.2d 968 ("[t]he purpose of a special defense is to plead facts that are consistent with the allegations of the complaint but demonstrate, nonetheless, that the plaintiff has no cause of action" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002) ; R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. Whitnum-Baker
See Fitzpatrick v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc., 72 Conn. App. 692, 697 , 807 A.2d 480 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 914 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002). ‘‘In reviewing claims that the trial court abused its discretion, great weight is given to the trial court’s decision and every reasonable presumption is given in favor of its correctness. . . .
cited
Cited "see"
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Coolbeth
See Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 705-706 , 807 A.2d 968 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Keller v. Beckenstein
See Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 718-19 , 807 A.2d 968 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gavlak v. Town of Somers
See State v. Robert H., 71 Conn.App. 289 , 298 n. 11, 802 A.2d 152 , cert. granted in part on other grounds, 262 Conn. 913 , 811 A.2d 1294 (2002); see also State v. Geisler, 222 Conn. 672, 684-86 , 610 A.2d 1225 (1992) (providing tools for independent state constitutional analysis). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lorson
See, e.g., Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 710 , 807 A.2d 968 (‘‘when the terms of the note and mortgage require notice of default, proper notice is a condition precedent to an action for foreclosure’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of New York Mellon v. Madison
See Saunders v. Stigers, 62 Conn. App. 138 , 146–47, 773 A.2d 971 (2001) (rejecting defendant’s claim that trial court improperly granted, in part, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to liability only when default notice ‘‘substantially complied’’ with notice pro- vision in mortgage requiring default notice to specify action required to cure default and that failure to cure default within allotted time could result in foreclosure or sale of property); see also Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700 , 713–15, 807 A.2d 968 (citing Saun- ders in concluding that defau…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Mazzeo
And again, that’s based upon the testimony which we’ve heard.’’ This court has recognized that ‘‘[t]he right of a mort- gagee to initiate a foreclosure action against a defaulting debtor depends on the mortgagee’s compliance with the notice provisions contained in the mortgage.’’ Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Goduto, 110 Conn. App. 367, 368 , 955 A.2d 544 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 956 , 961 A.2d 420 (2008); see also Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700, 707 , 807 A.2d 968 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002); Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seaside National Bank & Trust v. Lussier
A material fact is one that will make a difference in the result of the case.’’ (Cita- tion omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bank of New York Mellon v. Horsey, supra, 182 Conn. App. 436 ; see also Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky, 72 Conn. App. 700 , 715–16, 807 A.2d 968 (no genuine issue of material fact despite timely payments for nine years but subse- quent failure to make timely tax payments), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seaside National Bank & Trust v. Lussier
A material fact is one that will make a difference in the result of the case." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bank of New York Mellon v. Horsey , supra, 182 Conn. App. at 436 , 190 A.3d 105 ; see also Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky , 72 Conn. App. 700 , 715-16, 807 A.2d 968 (no genuine issue of material fact despite timely payments for nine years but subsequent failure to make timely tax payments), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 915 , 811 A.2d 1291 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
EUGENE A. COLEMAN
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 21, 2002.
Eugene A. Coleman, pro se, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.