Rhodes v. Comm'r, 815 A.2d 134 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Rhodes v. Comm'r, 815 A.2d 134 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Dayton (connappct, 2017-10-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Dayton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magowan v. Magowan , 73 Conn.App. 733 , 739, 812 A.2d 30 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 134 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Terry v. Terry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Magowan v. Magowan, 73 Conn. App. 733, 742 , 812 A.2d 30 (2002) (trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to open judgment due to postjudgment change in circumstances), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 134 (2003); Pascarelli v. Monliterno Stone Sales, 44 Conn. App. 397 , 401 n.7, 689 A.2d 1132 (claim to open voluntary agreement based on mutual mistake must fail because preemption of the statute governing agreement occurred after parties had entered into agreement), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 926 , 692 A.2d 1282 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Rosato v. Rosato
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) . . . .” (Citation omitted.) Magowan v. Magowan, 73 Conn. App. 733, 742 , 812 A.2d 30 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 134 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Laffin v. Laffin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Gaary v. Gillis, 162 Conn. App. 251 , 252 n.1, 131 A.3d 765 (2016) (noting distinction between motion to modify alimony and motion to open judgment based on fraud); see also Magowan v. Magowan, 73 Conn. App. 733, 737 , 812 A.2d 30 (2002) (‘‘if the [dissolution] judgment conforms to the stipulation it cannot be altered or set aside without the consent of all the parties, unless it is shown that the stipulation was obtained by fraud, accident or mistake’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 934 , 815 A.2d 134 (2003); Pospisil v. Pospisil, 59 Conn. App.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ANDRE RHODES
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 9, 2003.
815 A.2d 134
Sebastian O. DeSantis, special public defender, in support of the petition., James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

No opinion found.Click here to view source material.