green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See State v. Gonzalez, 74 Conn. App. 680 , 593, 814 A.2d 384 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 915 , 821 A.2d 771 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schiavo
See State v. Lindo, 75 Conn. App. 408, 416 , 816 A.2d 641 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 917 , 821 A.2d 771 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Palmer
See State v. Lindo, 75 Conn. App. 408 , 410 n.2, 816 A.2d 641 , cert. denied, 263 Conn. 917 , 821 A.2d 771 (2003). “ [A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and clearly deprived the defendant of a fair trial; and (4) if subject to harmless error analysis, the state has failed to demonstrate …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
EVARISTO GONZALEZ, FKA WILLIAM SANCHEZ, FKA FELIX APONTE
v.
EVARISTO GONZALEZ, FKA WILLIAM SANCHEZ, FKA FELIX APONTE
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 24, 2003.
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition., Rita M. Shair, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 580 (AC 21597), is denied.