green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Lil'Patrick T.
See State v. Henry, 76 Conn. App. 515, 551 , 820 A.2d 1076 (‘‘it is not the province of an intermediate appellate court to overturn the precedent of the jurisdiction’s highest court’’), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 908 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003). 5 The evidence before the court and the court’s memorandum of decision refer to this issue as domestic violence, interpersonal violence and intimate partner violence interchangeably.
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Henry, 76 Conn. App. 615 , 542 n.19, 820 A.2d 1076 , cert, denied, 264 Conn. 908 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Mikhail M.
See e.g., State v. Henry, 76 Conn. App. 515, 551 , 820 A.2d 1076 (‘‘it is not the province of an intermediate appellate court to overturn the precedent of the jurisdiction’s highest court’’), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 908 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003). 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 5 In re Mikhail M. omitted.) In re Fayth C., 220 Conn. App. 315 , 319–20, 297 A.3d 601 , cert. denied, 347 Conn. 907 , 298 A.3d 275 (2023).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alexander
See, e.g., State v. Henry, 76 Conn. App. 515, 548 , 820 A.2d 1076 , cert. denied, 264 Conn. 908 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003). 4 The defendant did not object to those instructions at trial and now seeks Golding review: “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation clearly exists and clearly deprived the defendant of a …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Coltherst
See, e.g., State v. Vitale, 76 Conn. App. 1, 10-14 , 818 A.2d 134 (two prejudicial remarks concerning defendant’s misconduct made during testimony before jury), cert, denied, 264 Conn. 906 , 826 A.2d 178 (2003); State v. Taveras, supra, 49 Conn. App. 650 -53 (four references made to defendant’s uncharged misconduct during testimony before jury).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
DEBORAH A. RANGER
v.
DEBORAH A. RANGER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 4, 2003.
Neal Cone, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Julia K. Conlin, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.