State v. Jeffreys, 833 A.2d 465 (Conn. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jeffreys, 833 A.2d 465 (Conn. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Purvis (connappct, 2024-08-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Purvis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659 , 676–77, 828 A.2d 659 (acknowledging that ‘‘[t]he quantity of drugs is not . . . the sole dispositive factor’’ because intent can be inferred through circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 248, 253, 61 A.3d 1084 (2013). ‘‘Moreover, [a] large num- ber of packets in the defendant’s possession is [a] fact from which the inference of possession with intent to sell can be drawn.’’ State v. Bowens, 24 Conn. App. 642, 649 , 591 A.2…
discussed Cited "see" Bharrat v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn.App. 659 , 666-67, 828 A.2d 659 (if argument in support of claim is different on appeal, argument is not preserved and only reviewable if argument meets requirements of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 567 A.2d 823 [ (1989) ] ), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 248, 253, 61 A.3d 1084 (2013).
discussed Cited "see" Savoie v. Daoud
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659, 677-81 , 829 A.2d 569 (single unchallenged, affirmative statement that subject apartment complex was public housing project sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of public housing project where defendant failed to object to testimony, cross-examine witness on issue or request offer of proof as to witness’ qualifications to testify to such), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , *38 833 A.2d 465 (2003); In re Jose M., 30 Conn. App. 381, 390 , 620 A.2d 804 (testimony became part of eviden…
cited Cited "see" State v. Pagan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jeffreys, 78 Conn. App. 659, 678-81 , 828 A.2d 659 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 913 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Richardson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Frank v. Dept. of Parks & Recreation, 78 Conn. App. 601, 607, 828 A.2d 692 (“[a]n administrative remedy, in order to be adequate, need not comport with the plaintiff[’s] opinion of what a perfect remedy would be” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert, granted on other grounds, 266 Conn. 914 , 833 A.2d 465 (2003). 4 Although the defendants additionally argue that the plaintiff also failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not seeking a waiver of immunity from the claims commission, we need not address this argument in light of our conclusion that the judgment should be aff…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MICHAEL JEFFREYS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 25, 2003.
833 A.2d 465
Kent Drager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Judith Rossi, executive assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 78 Conn. App. 659 (AC 21542), is denied.