green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Dur-A-Flex, Inc. v. Dy
See Zanoni v. Lynch, 79 Conn. App. 325, 338 , 830 A.2d 314 (‘‘[s]ummary judg- ment is an appropriate method for resolving issues of res judicata or collateral estoppel’’), cert. denied, 266 Conn. 928 , 837 A.2d 803 (2003); see also Solon v. Slater, 345 Conn. 794 , 810, 287 A.3d 574 (2023) (‘‘[t]he doctrine of collateral estoppel prevents a party from relitigating issues and facts [that have been] actually and necessar- ily determined in an earlier proceeding between the same parties or those in privity with them [on] a differ- ent claim’’ (emphasis omitted; internal quotation m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles
The rules of practice provide that judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Practice Book § 17-49; see also Zanoni v. Lynch, 79 Conn. App. 325, 333-34 , 830 A.2d 314 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 928 , 837 A.2d 803 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAUL ZANONI
v.
KAREN R. LYNCH ROSALIE B. ZANONI v. KAREN R. LYNCH ROSALIE B. ZANONI v. KEITH B. GALLANT
v.
KAREN R. LYNCH ROSALIE B. ZANONI v. KAREN R. LYNCH ROSALIE B. ZANONI v. KEITH B. GALLANT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 20, 2003.
Paul Zanoni, pro se, and Rosalie B. Zanoni, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 325 (AC 22858), is denied.
Paul Zanoni, pro se, and Rosalie B. Zanoni, pro se, in support of the petition. Decided November 20, 2003