State v. Lewis, 859 A.2d 565 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lewis, 859 A.2d 565 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Perez v. Dilworth (ctd, 2021-02-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Perez v. Dilworth
D. Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Perez, 271 Conn. 901 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004). 1 The first three grounds were included in a brief filed by an attorney who had been appointed to represent Perez on appeal and the remaining five grounds were asserted by Perez in a supplemental pro se brief.
discussed Cited "see" State v. ADEYEMI (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lewis, 83 Conn. App. 489 , 850 A.2d 1059 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 903 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Nicholson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nicholson, 83 Conn. App. 439 , 850 A.2d 1089 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 596 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002), on appeal after remand, 83 Conn. App. 439 , 850 A.2d 1089 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 906 , 859 A.2d 565 (2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1162 , 125 S. Ct. 1327 , 161 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Culver
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, the defendant’s argument is unavailing because it is well established that “[s]ince the legislature has shown that it knows how to bar multiple punishments expressly when it does not intend such punishment . . . the absence of similar language in those statutes provides evidence that the legislature intended cumulative punishments.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 323; see also State v. Perez, 78 Conn. App. 610, 642 , 828 A.2d 626 (2003) (noting several statutes in which legislature expressly prohibited multiple punishments for same incident), cert. d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Eddie Lewis
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 8, 2004.
859 A.2d 565
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition., Elizabeth M. Moseley, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Norcott.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 489 (AC 23502), is denied.

NORCOTT, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[*904] Decided September 8, 2004 Elizabeth M. Moseley, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.