green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Orr
See State v. Miller, 83 Conn. App. 789 , 802–803, 851 A.2d 367 (in holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked defendant’s probation, reviewing court noted that trial court ‘‘had before it the defendant’s long criminal history’’ and evidence of ‘‘his cavalier attitude about his probation’’), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 573 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. James E.
See State v. Giordano-Lanza, 83 Conn. App. 811, 814 , 851 A.2d 397 , cert. granted on other grounds, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 572 (2004) (appeal dismissed as moot October 25, 2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
See State v. Boykin, 83 Conn. App. 832, 839-40 , 851 A.2d 384 (holding claim of prose-cutorial impropriety was attempt to reassert challenges to court’s underlying rulings), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 570 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kendall
(2×)
See State v. Boykin, 83 Conn. App. 832, 839 , 851 A.2d 384 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 570 (2004). 4 The defendant also argued that the state made several statements during closing argument that improperly aroused the passions and emotions of the jury.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hicks
See State v. Giordano-Lanza, 83 Conn. App. 811, 819-20 , 851 A.2d 397 , cert. granted on other grounds, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 572 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Morris v. Cee Dee, LLC
See State v. Miller, 83 Conn. App. 789, 796-97 , 851 A.2d 367 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 911 , 859 A.2d 573 (2004).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
MICHAEL MILLER
v.
MICHAEL MILLER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 15, 2004.
Robert F. Field, public defender, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 789 (AC 23769), is denied.