State v. Hurdle, 861 A.2d 516 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Hurdle, 861 A.2d 516 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
86 citation events (86 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Lemanski (connappct, 2020-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Lemanski
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · confidence medium
If you find that the defendant did refuse to submit to such a test, you may make any reasonable inference that follows from that fact.’’ Id., 530.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Dalzell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · confidence medium
Id., 528.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Devin M.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Weaver, 85 Conn. App. 329, 353 , 857 A.2d 376 (fourth Asherman factor weighed in state’s favor because state’s ‘‘strong’’ case ‘‘was not in any way based upon the lost evidence’’), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 517 (2004).
cited Cited "see" State v. Kyle A.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Weaver, 85 Conn. App. 329 , 341–42, 857 A.2d 376 (setting forth essential elements of offense), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 517 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 534 , 854 A.2d 74 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004); see also State v. Gallichio, 71 Conn. App. 179, 190 , 800 A.2d 1261 (2002) (evidence of identical names alone was insufficient to prove defendant was person previously convicted).
cited Cited "see" Alldred v. Alldred
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1, 4 , 856 A.2d 459 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
cited Cited "see" State v. Polanco
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Weaver, 85 Conn. App. 329, 350 , 857 A.2d 376 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 517 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bereis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 854 A.2d 74 (noting that probative force of evidence not diminished by fact that evidence is circumstantial and that “[i]t is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of a multitude of facts which establishes guilt in a case involving substantial circumstantial evidence” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. McCarroll
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1, 6-7 , 856 A.2d 459 (res judicata bars court from considering same basis for relief regarding child support arrearages as asserted in prior proceeding), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004); Fish v. Igoe, 83 Conn. App. 398, 404 , 849 A.2d 910 (res judicata precluded relitigation of child support issue “pertaining to a past proceeding”), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 921 , 859 A.2d 577 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Terry v. Terry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See LaMacchia v. Chilinsky, 85 Conn. App. 1 , 6 n.4, 856 A.2d 459 (plaintiff should have requested continuance from court on issue if he desired to reargue motion on further inquiry), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 514 (2004).
cited Cited "see" State v. Morales
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Weaver, 85 Conn. App. 329, 350-51 , 857 A.2d 376 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 517 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thunelius v. Posacki
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
As subsequently noted in this opinion, however, we find the sanction problematic for reasons relating to the court’s authority to award fees generally. 9 ‘‘The appointment of a guardian ad litem, specifically authorized by General Statutes § 45a-132 (a), is governed by the same standards as those pertaining to an attorney for minor children, and the standards regarding payment of fees are the same for both categories.’’ Greenan v. Greenan, supra, 150 Conn. App. 306 n.12; see also Lamacchia v. Chilinsky, 79 Conn. App. 372 , 375 n.3, 830 A.2d 329 (2003) (‘‘[w]e note that although …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Haight
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well settled that “operating” encompasses a broader range of conduct than does “driving.” See State v. Swift, supra, 125 Conn. 402 -403 (statute “refers to persons who shall operate a motor vehicle, and is not confined to persons who shall drive a motor vehicle”); see also State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 527 , 854 A.2d 74 (“[t]he definition of ‘operation’ does not require [a] defendant to drive the car”), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Nash
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cir. 1992).” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Newton, supra, 369 F.3d 674 -75; see also State v. Weaver, 85 Conn. App. 329, 335 , 857 A.2d 376 (fact that officers took security measures by drawing weapons, performing patdown, handcuffing and placing robbery suspect in police cruiser in order to transport 300 feet to more secure location did not transform detention into arrest), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 942 , 861 A.2d 517 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Jamahl Hurdle
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 4, 2004.
861 A.2d 516
Robert J. McKay, special public defender, in support of the petition., Melissa L. Streeto, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 128 (AC 24230), is denied.

[*943] Decided November 4, 2004 Robert J. McKay, special public defender, in support of the petition. Melissa L. Streeto, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.