Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 871 A.2d 1031 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 871 A.2d 1031 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
66 citation events (66 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zuvic, Carr & Associates, Inc. v. Morande Brothers, Inc. (connappct, 2015-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Zuvic, Carr & Associates, Inc. v. Morande Brothers, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 87 Conn. App. 687, 694 , 867 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 926 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
The Appellate Court affirmed the judg- ment of conviction on direct appeal; see State v. Ander- son, 86 Conn. App. 854, 856 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005); and, on April 30, 2009, the petitioner filed an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
discussed Cited "see" State v. James
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Absent clear evidence to contrary, we presume that the jury followed the court’s limiting instructions; see State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005); and we cannot conclude that the prosecutor’s remarks were intended to induce the jury to do otherwise.
discussed Cited "see" Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 871-73 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Nance
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Anderson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
Following the affirmance of his conviction on direct appeal; see State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005); the defendant filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence, claiming that his sentence on the risk of injury charge exceeded the statutory maximum sentence.
cited Cited "see" State v. Virgo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 (jury presumed to follow court’s instructions absent clear evidence to contrary), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Cummings
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 863-64 , 864 A.2d 35 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLC (2×)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 87 Conn. App. 687, 695 , 867 A.2d 86 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 926 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005); Rules of Professional Conduct 1.5; Ernst v. Deere & Co., 92 Conn. App. 572, 576 , 886 A.2d 845 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jordan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, any prejudice was minimized by the court’s limiting instruction to the jury on the proper use of the misconduct evidence. 10 See State v. Lopez, 14 Conn. App. 536, 539 , 541 *652 A.2d 902 (1988) (“[s]uch a limiting instruction serves to minimize any possible prejudice”); see also State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 (jury presumed to follow court’s instructions absent clear evidence to contrary), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Disciplinary Counsel v. Smigelski (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Ernst v. Deere & Co., 92 Conn. App. 572, 576 , 886 A.2d 845 (2005); see also Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 87 Conn. App. 687, 695 , 867 A.2d 86 (listing twelve factors to be considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney’s fees and noting that “[t]hat list of factors is not, however, exclusive” and that “ [t]he court may assess the reasonableness of the fees requested using any number of factors” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 926 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Myers (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. James G., supra, 268 Conn. at 397-98 , 844 A.2d 810 ; see also State v. Anderson, 86 Conn.App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 (jury presumed to follow court's instructions absent clear evidence to contrary) cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. James G., supra, 268 Conn. 397 -98; see also State v. Anderson, 86 Conn. App. 854, 870 , 864 A.2d 35 (jury presumed to follow court’s instructions absent clear evidence to contrary), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1031 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Laura Ann KRACK
v.
ACTION MOTORS CORPORATION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 12, 2005.
871 A.2d 1031
Published

Joseph DaSilva, Danbury, Neal P. Rogan, Newtown, and Marc J. Grenier, Norwalk, in support of the petition.

Richard F. Wareing, Hartford, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn.App. 687, 867 A.2d 86 (2005), is denied.