green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Sim- mons, 86 Conn. App. 381, 389 , 861 A.2d 537 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 923 , 871 A.2d 1033 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 822 , 126 S. Ct. 356 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Victor C.
Moreover, the state need not present physical evidence in order to secure a conviction; see State v. Pedro S., 87 Conn. App. 183, 201 , 865 A.2d 1177 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1033 (2005); the jury may find a defendant guilty based solely on the testimony of one witness.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Farr
See State v. Pedro S., 87 Conn. App. 183, 199 , 865 A.2d 1177 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1033 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Quint
(2×)
See State v. Simmons, 86 Conn. App. 381, 391-92 , 861 A.2d 537 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 923 , 871 A.2d 1033 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 822 , 126 S. Ct. 356 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dabate
See, e.g., State v. Pedro S., 87 Conn. App. 183, 198 , 865 A.2d 1177 (asking jury to ‘‘[w]eigh everything [it] heard and [to] use [its] common sense’’ and stating that it was ‘‘in the state’s best interest for [the jurors] to use that common sense’’ were arguments properly based on contradictions in defendant’s testimony, rather than on prosecutor’s opinion (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1033 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gerald A.
See, e.g., State v. Pedro S. , 87 Conn. App. 183 , 201, 865 A.2d 1177 (concluding that there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to support defendant's conviction and noting that ''[t]he defendant's claim is based solely on the flawed premise that the state bore the burden of proving its case with physical evidence''), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 924 , 871 A.2d 1033 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bagnaschi
(2×)
The fighting words limitation, therefore, is not implicated here." (Footnote omitted.) Id., at 299-300 , 150 A.3d 720 ; see also State v. Simmons , 86 Conn. App. 381 , 389, 861 A.2d 537 (2004) (conviction based on defendant's conduct and not his speech), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 923 , 871 A.2d 1033 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 822 , 126 S.Ct. 356 , 163 L.Ed. 2d 64 (2005) ; see generally State v. DeLoreto , 265 Conn. 145 , 170-71, 827 A.2d 671 (2003) ( Katz, J. , concurring and dissenting) (majority's analysis should have focused on defendant's conduct, not "true threats" exception to speech protect…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Briggs
(2×)
Ed. 2d 1091 (2005); see also State v. Simmons, 86 Conn. App. 381, 387 , 861 A.2d 537 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 923 , 871 A.2d 1033 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 822 , 126 S. Ct. 356 , 163 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Augustus J. Simmons
v.
Augustus J. Simmons
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 12, 2005.
Augustus J. Simmons, pro se, in support of the petition., Erik T. Lohr, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 381 (AC 24163), which the Supreme Court accepts as filed on April 12, 2005, is denied.
[*924] Erik T. Lohr, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 12, 2005