Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 871 A.2d 1031 (Conn. 2005).

Krack v. Action Motors Corp., 871 A.2d 1031 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published Issue: Johnson factorsCT ↗ Issue: justification defenseCT ↗ 3.7 score

31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Zuvic, Carr & Assocs., Inc. v. Morande Bros., 116 A.3d 358 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015)

Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2005 2015 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

Zuvic, Carr & Assocs., Inc. v. Morande Bros., 116 A.3d 358 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015).published 2 cites
LoRicco v. Hula's New Haven, LLC, 117 A.3d 1007 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2013).published 2 cites
Disciplinary Couns. v. Smigelski, 4 A.3d 336 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010).published 2 cites

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 25

Cited "see, e.g." 4

Cited "see" 2

Treatment by court

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Laura Ann KRACK
v.
ACTION MOTORS CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Apr 12, 2005.

Published opinion

871 A.2d 1031

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

Joseph DaSilva, Danbury, Neal P. Rogan, Newtown, and Marc J. Grenier, Norwalk, in support of the petition.

Richard F. Wareing, Hartford, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn.App. 687, 867 A.2d 86 (2005), is denied.

Your account