State v. John M., 871 A.2d 372 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. John M., 871 A.2d 372 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events (78 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction (conn, 2016-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction (3×)
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hinds, 86 Conn. App. 557 , 558–59, 861 A.2d 1219 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 915 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. John F.M. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. John M., 273 Conn. 916, 916-17 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005) (granting petition for certification to appeal).
discussed Cited "see" State v. John F.M. (2×)
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. John M., 273 Conn. 916, 916-17 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005) (granting petition for certification to appeal).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sun
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hinds, 86 Conn. App. 557, 568 , 861 A.2d 1219 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 915 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005). “[T]he charge to the jury is not to be critically dissected for the purpose of discovering possible inaccuracies of statement, but it is to be considered rather as to its probable effect upon the jury in guiding [it] to a correct verdict in the case. . . .
cited Cited "see" State v. Cancel
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hinds, 86 Conn. App. 557, 570-72 , 861 A.2d 1219 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 915 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Zirinsky v. Zirinsky, 87 Conn. App. 257, 265 , 865 A.2d 488 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 916 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bross v. Hillside Acres, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Backus Hospital, 272 Conn. 551, 559 , 864 A.2d 1 (2005); see also Zirinsky v. Zirinsky, 87 Conn. App. 257, 267 , 865 A.2d 488 (interpretation of pleadings presents question of law subject to de novo review on appeal), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 916 , 871 A.2d 372 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
John M.
SC 17398.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 23, 2005.
871 A.2d 372
John W. Watson, special public defender, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 301 (AC 24174), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[*917] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17398. John W. Watson, special public defender, in support of the petition. Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 23, 2005

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, precluding evidence of M’s sexual abuse and of M’s animus toward the defendant, did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial?”