In Re Jed, 889 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
In Re Jed, 889 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Taylor, J. (pasuperct, 2023-12-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Taylor, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Taylor, 3707 EDA 2003 (Pa. Super. filed Jan. 14, 2005) (unpublished mem.), appeal denied, 889 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 2005).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Green
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lewis, supra. “Not all errors at trial, however, entitle an appellant to a new trial, and [t]he harmless error doctrine, as adopted in Pennsylvania, reflects the reality that the accused is entitled to a fair trial, not a perfect trial....” Reese, supra at 719 , (quoting Commonwealth v. West, 834 A.2d 625, 634 (Pa.Super. 2003), appeal denied, 586 Pa. 712 , 889 A.2d 1216 (2005)).
cited Cited "see" In The Interest of: T.W., a Minor
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Interest of: A.B., a Minor
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re Adoption of T.M.F., 573 A.2d 1035, 1044 (Pa. Super. 1990) (en banc) (plurality); see also In re K.D., 871 A.2d 823, 829 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 889 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 2005) (explaining in the context of a goal change appeal that an appellant must "show by clear and convincing evidence that it is more likely than not that the result would have been different absent the ineffectiveness[.]").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Interest of: L.B., a Minor
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
In re Adoption of T.M.F., 573 A.2d 1035, 1044 (Pa. Super. 1990) (en banc) (plurality); see also In re K.D., 871 A.2d 823, 829 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 889 A.2d 1216 (Pa. 2005) (explaining in the context of a goal change appeal that an appellant must "show by clear and convincing evidence that it is more likely than not that the result would have been different absent the ineffectiveness[.]").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE J.E.D., JR.
624 MAL (2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Dec 5, 2005.
889 A.2d 1216
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for allowance of appeal Denied.