green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Turner
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that, even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson, 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 (2005), which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, court would decline to review defendant’s unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants because defendant did not raise claim during trial), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006); cf. State v. Steele, 176 Conn. App. 1, 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (2017) …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jackson
See State v. Martinez , 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, 896 A.2d 109 (2006) (concluding that even if new jury instruction rule announced in State v. Patterson , 276 Conn. 452 , 886 A.2d 777 [2005], which was not of constitutional dimension, was retroactive, this court would decline to review defendant's unpreserved evidentiary claim that trial court failed to give jury instruction regarding credibility of jailhouse informants), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) ; cf. State v. Steele , supra, 176 Conn. App. at 24, 27, 31 , 169 A.3d 797 (reviewing preserved claim that court imprope…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Papineau
(2×)
See State v. Williams , 94 Conn. App. 424 , 433, 892 A.2d 990 (defendant's conduct before, during, and following incident may shed light on his state of mind), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 901 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Williams, 94 Conn. App. 424 , 426 n.2, 892 A.2d 990 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 901 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Zapata
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162, 193 , 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Banks
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 170 n.5, 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ramirez
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 170 n.5, 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006). 5 By this point, Terry already had spoken with the victim and her then boyfriend, Johnny Ramirez. 6 The testimony of the victim’s mother satisfied the parameters of State v. Troupe, 237 Conn. 284, 304 , 677 A.2d 917 (1996) (en banc), which held that “a person to whom a sexual assault victim has reported the assault may testily only with respect to the fact and timing of the victim’s complaint; any testimony by the witness regarding the details surrounding the assault mus…
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. Phillips
See Coscina v. Coscina, 24 Conn. App. 190, 193-94 , 587 A.2d 159 (1991). *75 Because we have concluded that the relevant term of the agreement is ambiguous, “[t]he determination of the intent of the parties to a contract ... is a question of fact subject to review under the clearly erroneous standard.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Santana v. Hartford, 94 Conn. App. 445, 465 , 894 A.2d 307 , cert. granted on other grounds, 279 Conn. 901 , 901 A.2d 1223 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Monroe
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 170 n.5, 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 170 n.5, 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Streater v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162, 182 , 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006) (improper question did not deprive defendant of fair trial where immediate objection made and curative instructions given).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162, 182 , 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006); State v. Lasky, 43 Conn. App. 619, 636 , 685 A.2d 336 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 959 , 688 A.2d 328 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Swain
State v. Luster, supra, 279 Conn. 435 ; see also State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162, 181 , 896 A.2d 109 (applying rule 3.4 of Rules of Professional Conduct), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006); see also State v. Warholic, supra, 278 Conn. 367 (“the prosecutor may argue for the reasonable inferences that the jury may draw from the evidence adduced at trial, including the defendant’s commission of the crime”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Finan v. Finan
See, e.g., State v. Irizarry, 95 Conn. App. 224 , 239 n.22, 896 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006). 6 The plaintiff has not asked this court to reverse all of the trial court’s financial orders on the basis of the order that the parties file a joint income tax return, nor would we do so if asked.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Rashad L. WILLIAMS.
v.
Rashad L. WILLIAMS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 22, 2006.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sarah F. Summons, special public defender, in support of the petition.
James A. Killen, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
[*1225] The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 424, 892 A.2d 990 (2006), is denied.