green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
DXR Finance Parent, LLC v. Theraplant, LLC
Accord- ingly, with limited exceptions discussed in part III of this opinion, ‘‘it is not within the power of appellate courts to resuscitate the mortgagor’s right of redemp- tion or otherwise to disturb the absolute title of the redeeming encumbrancer.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. ‘‘Simply put, once title has vested abso- lutely in the mortgagee, the mortgagor’s interest in the property is extinguished and cannot be revived by a reviewing court.’’ Id.; see also Connecticut National Mortgage Co. v. Knudsen, 323 Conn. 684 , 687 n.5, 150 A.3d 675 (2016) (‘‘an…
discussed
Cited "see"
DeRose v. Jason Robert's, Inc.
(2×)
See Ridgefield Bank v. Stones Trail, LLC, 95 Conn. App. 279, 287 , 898 A.2d 816 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 910 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Real Estate Mortgage Network, Inc. v. Squillante
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles , 95 Conn. App. 315 , 324, 898 A.2d 197 (noting that passing of law day extinguishes right of equitable redemption and vests title absolutely in mortgagee), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006) ; Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler , 20 Conn. App. 163 , 166, 565 A.2d 252 ("[u]nder our law, an action for strict foreclosure is brought by a mortgagee who, holding legal title, seeks not to enforce a forfeiture but rather to foreclose an equity of redemption unless the mortgagor satisfies the debt on or before his law day"), cert. denied, 213 Conn…
discussed
Cited "see"
Connecticut National Mortgage Co. v. Knudsen
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles , 95 Conn.App. 315 , 321-25, 898 A.2d 197 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006) ; Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler , 20 Conn.App. 163 , 166-68, 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 323 , 898 A.2d 197 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dreambuilders Construction, Inc. v. Diamond
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 323 , 898 A.2d 197 (“[i]n Connecticut, strict foreclosure is the rule, foreclosure by sale the exception” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tobet v. Tobet
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315 , 320 n.7, 898 A.2d 197 (substance of motion governs its outcome, rather than how it is characterized in title by movant), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pascal
(2×)
See generally State v. Alvarez, 95 Conn. App. 539, 553 , 897 A.2d 669 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 910 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timber Trails Associates v. Planning & Zoning Commission
See Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315, 329 , 898 A.2d 197 (“[o]ur role is not to guess at possibilities, but to review claims based on a complete factual record developed by the trial court” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michaud v. Travel Indemnity Co.
See, e.g., Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles, 95 Conn. App. 315 , 320 n.7, 898 A.2d 197 (‘‘[i]t is the substance of a motion . . . that governs its outcome’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 909 , 902 A.2d 1069 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parisi v. Niblett
Plenary review is afforded to issues of subject matter jurisdiction; see, e.g., Temlock v. Tem- lock, 95 Conn. App. 505, 518 , 898 A.2d 209 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 910 , 902 A.2d 1070 (2006); and statutory con- struction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
RIDGEFIELD BANK
v.
STONES TRAIL, LLC, et al.
v.
STONES TRAIL, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 6, 2006.
Published
Robert A. Fuller, Wilton, in support of the petition.
Matthew C. Mason, in opposition.
The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn.App. 279, 898 A.2d 816 (2006), is denied.