State v. Necaise, 912 A.2d 478 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Necaise, 912 A.2d 478 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events (111 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Dunbar (connappct, 2019-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dunbar (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Necaise , 97 Conn. App. 214 , 219, 904 A.2d 245 (resolution of whether pretrial identification procedure violates defendant's due process rights requires fact-finding *756 function of trial court), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006) ; State v. Sargent , 87 Conn. App. 24 , 30, 864 A.2d 20 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005)." State v. Collins , supra, at 256-57 , 5 A.3d 492 . *646 Similarly, in the present case, the court, in the absence of a motion to suppress or challenge to the admission into evidence of the photograph from the probation database,…
discussed Cited "see" Salaman v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Salaman, 97 Conn. App. 670 , 905 A.2d 739 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Collins (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Necaise, 97 Conn. App. 214, 219 , 904 A.2d 245 (resolution of whether pretrial identification procedure violates defendant’s due process rights requires fact-finding function of trial court), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006); State v. Sargent, 87 Conn. App. 24, 30 , 864 A.2d 20 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 912 , 870 A.2d 1082 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ayuso (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Salaman, 97 Conn. App. 670, 677 , 905 A.2d 739 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" State v. WILLIAM C. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Necaise, 97 Conn. App. 214 , 232 n.14, 904 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006). 12 With respect to the polygraph test, “polygraph evidence [is] per se inadmissible in all trial court proceedings in which the rules of evidence apply, and for all trial purposes, in Connecticut courts.” State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 94 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Outlaw (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Salaman, 97 Conn.App. 670, 677 , 905 A.2d 739 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Steven NECAISE.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 2006.
912 A.2d 478
Published

John M. Barton III, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 214, 904 A.2d 245 (2006), is denied.