discussed Cited "see" Weems v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing See Commonwealth v. Ulman, 902 A.2d 514, 519 (Pa.Super.2006), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 672 , 916 A.2d 1102 (2007) (the arresting officer was determined to be entitled to draw reasonable inferences from the facts in light of his twelve years of experience.

examined Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Robinson (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g." See Commonwealth v. Williams, 900 A.2d 906 (Pa.Super.2006) ( en banc ) (claim of denial of right of allocution implicates discretionary aspects), app. denied, 591 Pa. 673 , 916 A.2d 1102 (Pa.2007); Commonwealth v. Jacobs, 900 A.2d 368 (Pa.Super.2006) ( en banc ) (same), app. denied, 591 Pa. 681 , 917 A.2d 313 (Pa.2007); Commonwealth v. Berry, 877 A.2d 479 (Pa.Super.2005) ( en banc ) (claim that trial court violated plea agreement by imposing consecutive sentences and by not allowing defendant to withdraw his plea implicates discretionary aspects), app. denied, 591 Pa. 688 , 917 A.2d 844 (Pa.20…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Camacho, M. See also Commonwealth v. Williams, 900 A.2d 906, 909 (Pa.Super. 2006), appeal denied, 591 Pa. 673 , 916 A.2d 1102 (2007) (stating: “including an issue in a [c]oncise [s]tatement does not revive issues that were waived in earlier proceedings”).