State v. Cecil J., 920 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Cecil J., 920 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (43 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hees v. Burke Construction Inc. (conn, 2009-01-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hees v. Burke Construction Inc. (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scrivani v. Vallombroso, 99 Conn.App. 645, 654 , 916 A.2d 827 ("[t]o recover damages under CUTPA ... the defendant must prove more than a violation of the *387 statute" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 904 , 920 A.2d 309 , aff'd after remand, 102 Conn. App. 668 , 927 A.2d 920 (2007). [7] Accordingly, because I conclude that the referee properly considered the contract to be valid for purposes of the plaintiffs' complaint, I see no obstacle to relying on the contract to assess damages, as the case law requires.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Justice V.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re William D., 97 Conn. App. 600, 606 , 905 A.2d 696 (2006), aff'd, 284 Conn. 305 , 933 A.2d 1147 (2007). “[0]ur fundamental objective is to ascertain and give effect to the apparent intent of the legislature.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Strich, 99 Conn. App. 611, 633 , 915 *507 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 282 Conn. 907 , 920 A.2d 310 , cert. denied, 552 U.S. 901 , 128 S. Ct. 225 , 169 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Kalican
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Strich, 99 Conn. App. 611 , 626 n.17, 915 A.2d 891 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 907 , 920 A.2d 310 , cert. denied, 552 U.S. 901 , 128 S. Ct. 225 , 169 L.
cited Cited "see" Kendall v. Amster
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scrivani v. Vallombroso, 99 Conn. App. 645, 650 , 916 A.2d 827 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 904 , 920 A.2d 309 , aff'd after remand, 102 Conn. 668 , 927 A.2d 920 (2007).
cited Cited "see" Scrivani v. Vallombroso
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scrivani v. Vallombroso, 99 Conn. App. 645 , 916 A.2d 827 , cert. denied, 282 Conn. 904 , 920 A.2d 309 (2007).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Anderson
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jolley v. Commissioner of Correction, 98 Conn. App. 597 , 597–98, 910 A.2d 982 (2006), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 904 , 920 A.2d 308 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Cecil J.
SC 17890.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 12, 2007.
920 A.2d 310
Darcy McGraw, special public defender, in support of the petition., Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 99 Conn. App. 274 (AC 26510), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly excluded evidence of prior sexual conduct pursuant to the rape shield statute?”