green
Positive treatment
11.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298 , 327 and n.30, 922 A.2d 191 [cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 ] (2007).’’ And (2) ‘‘[i]f the defendant’s claim is more properly characterized as a claim of instructional error, was the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the definitions set forth in § 53a-118 (a) (2) and (4) (A) error and, if so, was the error harmful?
discussed
Cited "see"
L. H.-S. v. N. B.
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298 , 319–20, 922 A.2d 191 (in assessing fear element under General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 53a-181e, court considered entirety of victim’s testimony and was not limited to particular time frame), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
L. H.-S. v. N. B.
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298 , 319–20, 922 A.2d 191 (in assessing fear element under General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 53a-181e, court considered entirety of victim’s testimony and was not limited to particular time frame), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
See id. ("[A]n inventory search is a well-defined exception to the warrant requirement....
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gemmell
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lindsay
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Abreu
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gene C.
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Samms
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316-17 , 922 A.2d 191 (victim’s testimony that she saw defendant evinced visual proximity), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Vallejo v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Vallejo, 102 Conn. App. 628 , 926 A.2d 681 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 912 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. ERNESTO P.
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Foote
See State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Farnum v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Vallejo, 102 Conn. App. 628, 633-34 , 926 A.2d 681 , cert. denied, 284 *680 Conn. 912, 931 A.2d 934 (2007); State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sousa v. Sousa
See, e.g., *713 Terry v. Terry , 102 Conn.App. 215 , 227, 925 A.2d 375 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 911 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007). *770 The defendant relies on Weinstein v. Weinstein , supra, 275 Conn. at 685 , 882 A.2d 53 , for the proposition that "[m]isrepresentations of this magnitude cannot be attributed to mistake or miscalculation," but, rather, overwhelmingly evince the plaintiff's knowledge of the misrepresentation and intent to deceive.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reville v. Reville
See, e.g., Weinstein v. Weinstein, supra, 275 Conn. 684–85; Billington v. Bill- ington, supra, 220 Conn. 215 , 217–18; Jucker v. Jucker, 190 Conn. 674, 675, 677 , 461 A.2d 1384 (1983); see also Terry v. Terry, 102 Conn. App. 215, 223 , 925 A.2d 375 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 911 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ocasio
See, e.g., State v. Russell, 101 Conn. App. 298, 316 , 922 A.2d 191 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 910 , 931 A.2d 934 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cheryl TERRY
v.
William TERRY.
v.
William TERRY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 12, 2007.
Published
Kevin W. Hadfield, in support of the petition.
Ralph J. Monaco, New London, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 102 Conn.App. 215, 925 A.2d 375 (2007), is denied.