green
Positive treatment
11.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Matthew W.
See In re Anna Lee M., 104 Conn. App. 121, 128 , 931 A.2d 949 (‘‘for the court to make a determination as to the respondent’s prospects for rehabilitation, the court was required to obtain a historical perspective of the respondent’s child caring and parenting abilities’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Vita Built, LLC
See Capp Indus- tries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 110 n.6, 932 A.2d 453 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 10 The court’s description of some items being ‘‘above the line’’ and others ‘‘below the line’’ is simply incongruous with the express language of the waterfall provision, which contemplated the payment of all enumerated expenses, including the $126,000 in reinstated fees, as part of the calculation of net profits.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Lillyanne D.
See In re Anna Lee M., 104 Conn. App. 121, 128 , 931 A.2d 949 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 16 The record does not indicate what alternative caregiving plan the respon- dent father had proposed. 17 The department also may meet its burden concerning reunification efforts under § 17a-112 (j) (1) based on ‘‘a previous judicial determination that such efforts were not appropriate.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Ryder M., supra, 211 Conn. App. 808 . 18 After Richard was born in June, 2019, the court ordered specific steps that encompassed the same steps …
discussed
Cited "see"
Brewer v. Commissioner of Correction
See Jackson v. Com- missioner of Correction, 227 Conn. 124 , 131–32, 629 A.2d 413 (1993). ‘‘This [procedural] rule promotes not only the accuracy and efficiency of judicial decisions, but also the finality of those decisions, by forcing the defendant to litigate all of his claims together, as quickly after trial as the docket will allow, and while the atten- tion of the appellate court is focused on his case.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lorthe v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 696 , 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). ‘‘A…
discussed
Cited "see"
Atkins v. Commissioner of Correction
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 703 , 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 2 The petitioner uses the word ‘‘victims’’ to describe C, the victim whom he was convicted of sexually assaulting in this case, and C’s stepsister, A, whom the petitioner had allegedly sexually assaulted five years earlier. 3 ‘‘In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of the victims of sexual abuse and the crime of risk of injury to a child, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom the victim’s identity ma…
cited
Cited "see"
J & E Investment Co. v. Athan
See Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 109 n.5, 932 A.2d 453 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 , 697 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Danzig v. PDPA, INC.
See Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101 , 109 n.5, 932 A.2d 453 (“a judgment of foreclosure is not a final judgment until the trial court determines the method of foreclosure and the amount of the debt”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 , 697 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mozell v. Commissioner of Correction
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662 , 668 n.4, 931 A.2d 348 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007). 4 In State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. 240 , we stated that “[i]n the absence of any one of these conditions, the [petitioner’s] claim will fail.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
(2×)
See Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 699 , 931 A.2d 348 (“[t]his court does not review claims raised for the first time on appeal”), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fezollari v. Jauzovic
Although we are cognizant that the trial court is entitled to great deference . . . we nevertheless conclude under the unique circumstances presented here that equity requires a new trial.’’); see also Capp Industries, Inc. v. Schoenberg, 104 Conn. App. 101, 118 , 932 A.2d 453 (‘‘[u]nder these circumstances, in which the [parties], through no fault of their own, could not have obtained an articulation, it would be unjust to decline summarily to review their claim’’), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007), and cert. denied, 284 Conn. 941 , 937 A.2d 697 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little v. Commissioner of Correction
On April 29, 2016, the petitioner's appellate counsel filed an Anders brief and a motion for permission to withdraw as counsel, representing that "[u]pon thorough review and examination of the transcripts, information and record in this matter, the undersigned has determined that an appeal in this matter would be frivolous." See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; see, e.g., Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction , 103 Conn.App. 662 , 674, 931 A.2d 348 (discussing filing of briefs by appointed counsel, pursuant to Anders , to inform court that ha…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaddah v. Commissioner of Correction
If the officer fails to make immediate return of the writ, with his actions thereon, he shall pay fifty dollars to the person so held in custody...." 16 See footnote 9 of this opinion for the full text of § 52-470. 17 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 , 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) ; see, e.g., Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction , 103 Conn.App. 662 , 676, 931 A.2d 348 (discussing filing of briefs by appointed counsel, pursuant to Anders , to inform court that habeas petition or appeal is "wholly frivolous"), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007) ; see also Pra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Victor D.
See Practice Book § 60-5 (‘‘[t]he court shall not be bound to consider a claim unless it was distinctly raised at the trial or arose subsequently to the trial’’); see also In re Anna Lee M., 104 Conn. App. 121 , 124 n.2, 931 A.2d 949 , cert. denied, 294 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction
At the time of the court’s judgment dismissing the petitioner’s consolidated petition, Practice Book (2009) § 23-42 (a) provided in relevant part: “If the judicial *411 authority finds that the case is wholly without merit, it shall allow counsel to withdraw and shall consider whether the petition shall be dismissed or allowed to proceed, with the petitioner pro se. . . .” This court has held that this subsection “provides an explicit exception to the general rule requiring an evidentiary hearing before a habeas petition may be dismissed.” Riddick v. Commissioner of Correction, 11…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Riddick v. Commissioner of Correction
Id., 381-82; see also Lorthe v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 662, 693 , 931 A.2d 348 (habeas court sua sponte dismissed habeas petition pursuant to Practice Book § 23-42), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 939 , 937 A.2d 696 (2007); cf. Coleman v. Commissioner of Correction, 99 Conn. App. 310, 312-13 , 913 A.2d 477 (habeas court permitted petitioner to proceed pro se rather than dismiss petition), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 924 , 918 A.2d 275 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Capp Industries, Inc.
v.
Sabine H. Schoenberg Et Al.; Robert v. Lardon Et Al. v. John Cappiali Et Al.
v.
Sabine H. Schoenberg Et Al.; Robert v. Lardon Et Al. v. John Cappiali Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 5, 2007.
John F. X. Peloso, Jr., in support of the petition.
Rogers.
Published
The petition by Robert V. Lardon and Sabine H. Schoenberg for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 101 (AC 27933), is denied.
ROGERS, C. J., and SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.