State v. Marcial, 942 A.2d 415 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
State v. Marcial, 942 A.2d 415 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
111 citation events (111 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Essaghof (connappct, 2022-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Essaghof
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Young v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn. App. 188 , 190 n.1, 932 A.2d 467 (2007) (when decision lacks specificity, Appellate Court presumes trial court made necessary findings and determinations supported by record on which judgment is predicated), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 942 A.2d 416 (2008).
examined Cited "see" Salgado v. Commissioner of Corr. (3×)
D. Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Marcial S., 285 Conn. 907 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Mason v. Ford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Young v. Commissioner of Correction , 104 Conn.App. 188 , 190 n.1, 932 A.2d 467 (2007) (when decision lacks specificity, Appellate Court presumes trial court made necessary findings and determinations supported by the record on which judgment is predicated), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 942 A.2d 416 (2008) ; Champagne v. Champagne , 85 Conn.App. 872 , 879, 859 A.2d 942 (2004) ("[i]n the absence of an articulation, we presume that the trial court acted properly" [internal quotation marks omitted] ); Zadravecz v. Zadravecz , 39 Conn.App. 28 , 32, 664 A.2d 303 (1995) (same).
discussed Cited "see" Stamatopoulos v. ECS North America, LLC (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Thorndike , 104 Conn.App. 297 , 308, 934 A.2d 827 (2007) ("[a]n essential element of ... conversion is the requirement that the party asserting such a claim have either a legal right or possessory interest in the property at issue"), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 908, 942 A.2d 415 (2008) ; Cornelio v. Stamford Hospital , 246 Conn. 45 , 49, 717 A.2d 140 (1998) (prima facie claim for replevin pursuant to General Statutes § 52-515 requires proof, inter alia, that the plaintiff "has a property interest in the [property]" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
cited Cited "see" State v. Fernandez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mungroo , 104 Conn.App. 668 , 677, 935 A.2d 229 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Hurlburt v. DeRosa (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Thorndike, 104 Conn. App. 297, 299 , 934 A.2d 827 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 908, 942 A.2d 415 , 416 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
We agree that a motion to dismiss may be decided on the pleadings; see Young v. Commissioner of Correction, 104 Conn. App. 188, 193 , 932 A.2d 467 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 942 A.2d 416 (2008); and we do not conclude that the second habeas court erred in granting the respondent’s motion to dismiss on that basis.
discussed Cited "see" Yellow Cab Co. of New London & Groton, Inc. v. Department of Transportation (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. Thorndike, 104 Conn. App. 297, 301 , 934 A.2d 827 (2007) (dismissal not required absent statutory requirement that party be named in underlying proceeding), cert, denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 908, 942 A.2d 415 , 416 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mungroo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mungroo, 104 Conn. App. 668, 669 , 935 A.2d 229 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mungroo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mungroo, 104 Conn. App. 668 , 935 A.2d 229 (2007) (reversed only as to sentence for falsely reporting incident in second degree and remanded for resentencing), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramirez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mungroo, 104 Conn. App. 668, 673 , 935 A.2d 229 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ray v. Ray
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Hughes v. Hughes , supra, 95 Conn. App. at 208 , 895 A.2d 274 ; see also Young v. Commissioner of Correction , 104 Conn. App. 188 , 190 n.1, 932 A.2d 467 (2007) (when decision lacks specificity, this court presumes trial court made necessary findings if we are able to infer facts on which court's decision appears to have been predicated), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 942 A.2d 416 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ellis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Robles , 169 Conn.App. 127 , 131, 150 A.3d 687 (2016), cert. denied, 324 Conn. 906 , 152 A.3d 544 (2017) ; see also Young v. Commissioner of Correction , 104 Conn.App. 188 , 193, 932 A.2d 467 (2007) (whether legal conclusions of trial court are legally and logically correct subject to plenary review), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 907 , 942 A.2d 416 (2008).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gibson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Mungroo, 104 Conn. App. 668 , 680 n.1, 935 A.2d 229 (2007), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. HELMEDACH
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Ovechka, 292 Conn. 533, 541 , 975 A.2d 1 (2009); see also State v. Mungroo, 104 Conn. App. 668, 673 , 935 A.2d 229 (2007) (choosing among competing inferences within exclusive province of jury), cert. denied, 285 Conn. 908 , 942 A.2d 415 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
MARCIAL S.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2008.
942 A.2d 415
Published

Michael L. Moscowitz, New Haven, in support of the petition.

Kathryn Ward Bare, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn.App. 361, 935 A.2d 154 (2007), is denied.