State v. Ayuso, 944 A.2d 983 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Ayuso, 944 A.2d 983 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
72 citation events (72 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ayuso v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2022-09-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ayuso v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ayuso, 286 Conn. 911 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Nelson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nelson, 286 Conn. 913 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Nelson v. Preleski
D. Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nelson, 105 Conn.App. 393, 418 , 937 A.2d 1249 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 913 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008). [Nelson] then filed a timely application under General Statutes § 51–1954 with the sentence review division of the Superior Court, seeking a reduction of his sentence.
cited Cited "see" Nelson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nelson , 105 Conn.App. 393 , 418, 937 A.2d 1249 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 913 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" State v. D'Amato (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ayuso, 105 Conn. App. 305 , 329–30, 937 A.2d 1211 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 911 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008) (‘‘Contrary to the defendant’s asser- tion, the prosecutor did not comment on the absence of [the witness].
cited Cited "see" State v. Stovall
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. McCarthy, 105 Conn. App. 596, 608 , 939 A.2d 1195 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 913 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" State v. EDWARD M. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ayuso, 105 Conn. App. 305, 326 , 937 A.2d 1211 (“[r]emarks that are nothing more than a permissible appeal to the jurors’ common sense do not constitute prosecutorial [impropriety]” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 911 , 944 A.2d 983 (2008); see also State v. Chasse, 51 Conn. App. 346 , 361, 721 A.2d 1212 (1998) (“[j]urors are not expected to lay aside matters of common knowledge or their own observations and experiences, but rather, to apply them to the facts as presented to arrive at an intelligent and correct conclusion” [internal quotation…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Jose AYUSO.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 18, 2008.
944 A.2d 983
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Stephanie L. Evans, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Harry D. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn.App. 305, 937 A.2d 1211 (2008), is denied.