green
Positive treatment
13.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Angel A. (Dissent)
See J.R. v. Commissioner of Correction, 105 Conn. App. 827, 843 , 941 A.2d 348 (‘‘the petitioner does not argue, nor do we conclude, that defense counsel is 0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 11 0 Conn. App. 0 ,0 13 State v. Angel A. required in all circumstances to poll the jury, absent some indication that the verdict was not unanimous’’ (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 915 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Ja'maire M.
(2×)
See In re T.K., 105 Conn. App. 502 , 505–506, 939 A.2d 9 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008) (‘‘[A]n adjudication of neglect relates to the sta- tus of the child . . . .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gabriel v. Gabriel
(2×)
See In re T.K. , 105 Conn.App. 502 , 506, 939 A.2d 9 ( [t]he application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law to which we apply a plenary standard of review), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008) ; Unkelbach v. McNary , 244 Conn. 350 , 357, 710 A.2d 717 (1998) (interpretation of statutory scheme that governs child support determinations constitutes question of law)." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) LaFrance v. Lodmell , 322 Conn. 828 , 842-43, 144 A.3d 373 (2016) ; see also Tuckman v. Tuckman , 308 Conn. 194 , 200, 61 A.3d 449 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaFrance v. Lodmell
(2×)
See In re T.K., 105 Conn. App. 502, 506 , 939 A.2d 9 ([t]he application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law to which we apply a plenary standard of review), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008); Unkel- bach v. McNary, 244 Conn. 350, 357 , 710 A.2d 717 (1998) (interpretation of statutory scheme that governs child support determinations constitutes question of law).’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tuckman v. Tuck- man, 308 Conn. 194 , 200, 61 A.3d 449 (2013).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaFrance v. Lodmell
(2×)
See In re T.K., 105 Conn.App. 502 , 506, 939 A.2d 9 ( [t]he application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law to which we apply a plenary standard of review), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008) ; Unkelbach v. McNary, 244 Conn. 350 , 357, 710 A.2d 717 (1998) (interpretation of statutory scheme that governs child support determinations constitutes question of law)." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tuckman v. Tuckman, 308 Conn. 194 , 200, 61 A.3d 449 (2013).
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Joseph W., Jr.
(8×)
Pursuant to the procedural posture of this case, the petitioner did not have to prove at the termination hearing that the children were neglected but only that the children had been found to be neglected in a prior proceeding. 13 Because the neglect adjudications relate to the children, and not to either of the parents; see In re T.K., 105 Conn. App. 502, 505-506 , 939 A.2d 9 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008); 14 if the father is successful in his claim regarding the deprivation of his rights in the neglect proceeding, the finding of neglect, despite the mother’s nolo plea,…
examined
Cited "see"
Maturo v. Maturo
(4×)
See In re T.K., 105 Conn. App. 502, 506 , 939 A.2d 9 (“[t]he application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law to which we apply a plenary standard of review”), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008); Unkelbach v. McNary, 244 Conn. 350, 357 , 710 A.2d 717 (1998) (interpretation of statutory scheme that governs child support determinations constitutes question of law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Eastwood, 83 Conn. App. 452, 454 , 454 n.1, 850 A.2d 234 (2004) (defendant sentenced to total effective term of nine years incarceration, followed by fifteen years of special parole), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 978 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mansfield
See, e.g., State v. Eastwood, 83 Conn. App. 452, 454-55 , 850 A.2d 234 (2004) (defendant threateningly demanded that ten and eleven year old boys enter his car and accompany him to nearby town), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 978 (2008); State v. Payne, 40 Conn. App. 1, 3 , 669 A.2d 582 (1995) (defendant forced young boys by threat to urinate into cup), affd, 240 Conn. 766 , 695 A.2d 525 (1997), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Romero, 269 Conn. 481, 490 , 849 A.2d 760 (2004); State v. Erzen, 29 Conn. App. 591, 592 , 617 A.2d 177 (1992) (defendant asked young girls to unz…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Francisco R.
(2×)
In this opinion the other judges concurred. 1 “Our statutes clearly and explicitly recognize the state’s authority to act before harm occurs to protect children whose health and welfare may be adversely affected and not just children whose welfare has been affected.” (Emphasis added.) In re Michael D., 58 Conn. App. 119, 124 , 752 A.2d 1135 (2000), cert. denied, 254 Conn. 911 , 759 A.2d 505 (2002); see also In re T.K., 105 Conn. App. 502, 513 , 939 A.2d 9 , cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 976 (2008). 2 Although the neglect petition included allegations against the child’s mother…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Aziegbemi
See State v. Sorabella, supra, 277 Conn. 174 -84; see also State v. Eastwood, 83 Conn. App. 452 , 850 A.2d 234 (2004) (enticing minors to enter vehicle for sexual purposes prohibited under “situation” prong), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 914 , 945 A.2d 978 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maureen MURPHY
v.
LORD THOMPSON MANOR, INC.
v.
LORD THOMPSON MANOR, INC.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 25, 2008.
Published
Julie D. Blake, in support of the petition.
Lindy R. Urso, Stamford, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn.App. 546, 938 A.2d 1269 (2008), is denied.