green
Positive treatment
13.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lyons
(2×)
See State v. Gonzalez, 106 Conn. App. 238, 249 , 941 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gamble v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Hamlett , 105 Conn. App. 862 , 867, 939 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 901 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008). 8 The jury had for its consideration conflicting accounts as to who fired the SKS rifle.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bennett
(2×)
See generally State v. Gonzalez , 106 Conn.App. 238 , 261-62, 941 A.2d 989 (distinguishing procedures required to initiate petition for new trial from those for motion for new trial), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
(2×)
Well, only the one that we previously dis- cussed [concerning the apparent request for an instruc- tion on the lesser included offense].’’ It is well settled that, pursuant to Practice Book § 42- 16, to preserve for appeal a claim that the court improp- erly failed to give a jury instruction on a matter, ‘‘the defendant must [submit] a written request to charge, or take exception to the jury instructions when they are given by the trial court.’’ (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Faria, 254 Conn. 613, 632 , 758 A.2d 348 (2000); see Practice Book § 42- 16…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Giovanni P.
(2×)
The defendant must bring a petition under [§ 42–55] if he wishes to seek a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence.’’ [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), cert. denied, 280 Conn. 920 , 908 A.2d 545 (2006); see State v. Gonzalez, 106 Conn. App. 238, 260 , 941 A.2d 989 (trial court lacked authority to consider defendant’s motion for new trial on basis of newly discovered evidence), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coyne
(2×)
See State v. Gonzalez, 106 Conn. App. 238, 249 , 941 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008); State v. LaVallee, 101 Conn. App. 573, 579 , 922 A.2d 316 , cert. denied, 284 Conn. 903 , 931 A.2d 267 (2007); Bicio v. Brewer, 92 Conn. App. 158, 171-72 , 884 A.2d 12 (2005). *825 The defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Collazo
See State v. Hamlett, 105 Conn. App. 862, 878 , 939 A.2d 1256 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 901 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Andrews
(2×)
See State v. Hazel, 106 Conn. App. 213, 225-27 , 941 A.2d 378 (simultaneous intents not necessarily mutually exclusive), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Daniels
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Hazel, 106 Conn. App. 213, 223 , 941 A.2d 378 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008). ‘‘When a jury has [returned] legally inconsis- tent verdicts, there is no way for the reviewing court to know which charge the jury found to be supported by the evidence. . . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Andres C.
See, e.g., State v. Holly, 106 Conn. App. 227 , 235–36, 941 A.2d 372 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 334 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jackson
We note that even in circumstances where the state has committed a discovery violation, "[s]uppression of relevant, material and otherwise admissible evidence is a severe sanction which should not be invoked lightly." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Cooke , supra, 134 Conn. App. at 579 , 39 A.3d 1178 ; see also State v. Hamlett , 105 Conn. App. 862 , 874, 939 A.2d 1256 (denial of proposed remedy of exclusion of police officer's field notes, which were not previously disclosed to defense and which affected defense strategy of contradicting victim through police report, was not abus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Walker
(2×)
The appellant shall determine whether the entire trial court record is complete, correct and otherwise perfected for presenta- tion on appeal.’’); see, e.g., State v. Hazel, 106 Conn. App. 213 , 220–22, 941 A.2d 378 (deeming record inade- quate to review claimed violation of right to be present at critical stage when it did not reflect scope of in chambers discussions), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bruno
See, e.g., State v. Holly, 106 Conn. App. 227, 233 , 941 A.2d 372 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 344 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rogers
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Gonzalez, 106 Conn. App. 238 , 240 n.l, 941 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008). 7 The defendant conceded in his brief that joining the charges of attempted assault and carrying a pistol without a permit with the murder charges would pass muster under the Boscarino test.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joseph
(2×)
This court already has concluded, however, that the rule announced in Patterson is not of constitutional dimension and, therefore, should not be given retroactive effect. 2 State v. Martinez, 95 Conn. App. 162 , 166 n.3, *463 896 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 279 Conn. 902 , 901 A.2d 1224 (2006); see also State v. Gonzalez, 106 Conn. App. 238, 246 , 941 A.2d 989 (Patterson claim fails under second prong of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989), pertaining to appellate review of unpreserved claims of constitutional error), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 903 , 947 A.2d 343 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Angel GONZALEZ.
v.
Angel GONZALEZ.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 30, 2008.
Published
Christopher M. Neary, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 ConnApp. 238, 941 A.2d 989 (2008), is denied.