State v. Kimble, 950 A.2d 1289 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Kimble, 950 A.2d 1289 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Edmonds (conn, 2016-09-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Edmonds
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Kimble, 106 Conn.App. 572 , 594-95, 942 A.2d 527 (occupants of parked vehicle not seized when, at night, uniformed police officer exited marked cruiser, approached vehicle, and questioned them), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 912 , 950 A.2d 1289 (2008) ; see also Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 497-98, 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) ("officers do not violate the [f]ourth [a]mendment by merely approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he is willing to answer some questions [or] by putting questions to him if the person is willing …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Edmonds
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Kimble, 106 Conn. App. 572 , 594–95, 942 A.2d 527 (occupants of parked vehicle not seized when, at night, uniformed police offi- cer exited marked cruiser, approached vehicle, and questioned them), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 912 , 950 A.2d 1289 (2008); see also Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 497–98, 103 S. Ct. 1319 , 75 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Houghtaling
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moskowitz, who observed the van and made the radio transmission, testified that ‘‘[w]e believed at that point in time [that the driver] was part of the investigation.’’ First, the court did not err in considering the defen- dant’s entering onto the property while the police were investigating the large marijuana grow operation as a factor contributing to reasonable suspicion. ‘‘The nature of the crime under investigation, the degree of suspicion, the location of the stop, the time of day, the reaction of the suspect to the approach of police are all facts which bear on the issue …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Terrell K. KIMBLE.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 21, 2008.
950 A.2d 1289
Norcott.
Published

James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn.App. 572, 942 A.2d 527 (2008), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.