State v. Linarte, 957 A.2d 873 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Linarte, 957 A.2d 873 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Solek v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2021-03-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Solek v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solek v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 107 Conn. App. 473, 488 , 946 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Kaminsky v. Commissioner of Emergency Services & Public Protection
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solek v. Commissioner of Correction , 107 Conn. App. 473 , 476, 946 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Thompson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solek v. Commissioner of Correction , 107 Conn. App. 473 , 480, 946 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Flomo v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Solek v. Commissioner of Correction , 107 Conn.App. 473 , 479 n.2, 946 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
cited Cited "see" Linarte v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Linarte, 107 Conn. App. 93 , 944 A.2d 369 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 901 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Curran v. Kroll
Conn. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (“[t]he responsibility of a habeas court, in confronting an often voluminous trial court record, is to respond to those claims fairly advanced by the petitioner” [emphasis added]).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Palkimas
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Linarte, 107 Conn. App. 93, 104 , 944 A.2d 369 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 901 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008). 9 To the extent that the state claims that the defendant failed to preserve his claim that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, this claim of waiver lacks merit. “[T]he subject matter jurisdiction of a court addresses the fundamental competency of that court to operate as adjudicator, and such claims therefore may be made by any party at any time, or may be raised by the court sua sponte.” Office of the Governor v. Select Committee of Inquiry, 271 Conn. 540 , 550 n.10, …
discussed Cited "see" In Re Tayler F. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Linarte, 107 Conn. App. 93 , 104 n.6, 944 A.2d 369 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 901 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Bharrat v. Commissioner of Correction , 167 Conn. App. 158 , 181-82, 143 A.3d 1106 (declining to review argument on appeal that was never raised in habeas court), cert. denied, 323 Conn. 924 , 149 A.3d 982 (2016) ; see also Solek v. Commissioner of Correction , 107 Conn. App. 473 , 480, 946 A.2d 239 ("[i]t is not the responsibility of the trial judge ... to search a record, often, in a habeas case, involving hundreds of pages of transcript, in order to find some basis for relief for a petitioner"), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tyler v. Tyler
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
I Whether the trial court correctly determined that none of the plaintiffs’ claims against Tatoian were still pending in the trial court after our dismissal of their initial appeal is a mixed question of law and fact. ‘‘Ques- tions of law and mixed questions of law and fact receive plenary review.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Correia v. Rowland, 263 Conn. 453, 462 , 820 A.2d 1009 (2003); see also Solek v. Commissioner of Correction, 107 Conn. App. 473, 479 , 946 A.2d 239 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 902 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. TOMAS D.
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
We must defer to the trier of fact’s assessment of the credibility of the witnesses that is made on the basis of its firsthand observation of their conduct, demeanor and attitude.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mullins, 288 Conn. 345, 365 , 952 A.2d 784 (2008); see also, e.g., State v. Linarte, 107 Conn. App. 93, 117-18 , 944 A.2d *487 369 (“[t]hough labeled as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this claim rests on an assessment of the witnesses’ credibility”), cert. denied, 289 Conn. 901 , 957 A.2d 873 (2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Francisco Linarte
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 5, 2008.
957 A.2d 873
Deborah G. Stevenson, special public defender, in support of the petition., Sarah Hanna, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Schaller.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 107 Conn. App. 93 (AC 25607), is denied.

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[*902] Decided September 5, 2008 Sarah Hanna, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.