Blinkoff v. O & G Indus., Inc., 969 A.2d 175 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Blinkoff v. O & G Indus., Inc., 969 A.2d 175 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Davis (connappct, 2015-03-31)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bell, 113 Conn. App. 25, 50 , 964 A.2d 584 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 914 , 969 A.2d 175 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" Coss v. Steward (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
The paragraphs contain hearsay or double hearsay; see Blinkoff v. O & G Industries, Inc., 113 Conn. App. 1, 12 , 965 A.2d 556 (hearsay insufficient to create genuine issue of fact), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 913 , 969 A.2d 175 (2009); or a legal conclusion. 8 The plaintiffs also claim that in deciding that the defendants were not estopped from asserting statute of limitations special defenses, the court considered irrelevant issues, specifically, that the defendants had told the plaintiffs to file a claim with Baltazar if they were dissatisfied with repairs to the wall.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Reeves
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thornton, 112 Conn. App. 694, 710 , 963 A.2d 1099 (if defense counsel believed court’s ruling was unclear, it was defense counsel’s obligation to seek further clarification), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 914 , 969 A.2d 175 (2009). 6 To the contrary, the record discloses that the court was willing to allow the defendant’s alibi witnesses to testify.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ebron
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Thornton, 112 Conn. App. 694 , 700 n.10, 963 A.2d 1099 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 914 , 969 A.2d 175 (2009). 9 The previous day, which was the first day of jury selection, as he questioned B.D., the first panel member, the prosecutor stated that “self-defense, or as it more — as it’s legally called defense of person, might be raised in this case.” Before B.D. could answer any questions on this topic, the trial court asked to see counsel at sidebar, but that particular exchange and ruling were not put on the record at that time.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Berrios
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Reversal is required only whe[n] an abuse of discretion is manifest or whe[n] injustice appears to have been done." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Small , 180 Conn. App. 674 , 683, 184 A.3d 816 , cert. denied, 328 Conn. 938 , 184 A.3d 268 (2018) ; see also State v. Bell , 113 Conn. App. 25 , 45, 964 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 914 , 969 A.2d 175 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holly Blinkoff Et Al.
v.
O and G Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 21, 2009.
969 A.2d 175
Holly Blinkoff, pro se, in support of the petition.
McLACHLAN.
Published

The named plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 1 (AC 28506), is denied.

McLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.