green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Graves v. State
Accord Miller v. State, 185 Md.App. 293, 295, 307, 309 , 970 A.2d 332 (Where “defense counsel did not represent that he had explained the nature and elements of the crime to the appellant,” and neither the judge, defense counsel, or the prosecutor explained on the record the nature and elements of first-degree burglary, Mr. Miller’s statement that he understood the plea agreement “was not tantamount to acknowledging that he understood the nature and elements of first-degree burglary.”), cert. denied, 410 Md. 166 , 978 A.2d 246 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yates v. State
Accord Robinson, 410 Md. at 104 , 976 A.2d 1072 (appellate court’s “prerogative to review an unpreserved claim of error, however, is to be rarely exercised and only when doing so furthers, rather than undermines, the purposes of the rule”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephens v. State
(2×)
Polk v. State, 183 Md.App. 299, 306 , 961 A.2d 603 (2008); accord Burlas v. State, 185 Md.App. 559, 568 , 971 A.2d 937 , cert. denied, 410 Md. 166 , 978 A.2d 245 (2009).
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Motor Vehicle Administration
See Hill v. Motor Vehicle Admin., 410 Md. 165 , 978 A.2d 245 (2009) (granting certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frison v. Mathis
See Henriquez v. Henriquez, 185 Md.App. 465, 476 , 971 A.2d 345 (2009) (argument that “court has no authority under the statute to award attorney’s fees unless that party actually incurred expenses for legal fees” is a question of law reviewed de' novo), cert. granted, 410 Md. 165 , 978 A.2d 245 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ERIC BURLAS
v.
STATE.
v.
STATE.
Pet. Docket No. 197.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jan 1, 2009.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari denied.