In Re Laquita J., 995 A.2d 297 (Md. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Laquita J., 995 A.2d 297 (Md. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2013–2019 · …in reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we look exclusively to the record of the suppression hearing. ⚠ not in text
63 citation events (63 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Myers v. State (mdctspecapp, 2019-11-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Myers v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we look exclusively to the record of the suppression hearing.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Coley v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2013 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we look exclusively to the record of the suppression hearing.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IN RE LAQUITA J.
Pet. Docket No. 604.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jan 1, 2010.
995 A.2d 297
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (2)

Petition for writ of certiorari and cross-petition—both denied.