State v. Jevarjian, 11 A.3d 152 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Jevarjian, 11 A.3d 152 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Jarmon (connappct, 2020-01-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Jarmon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113, 122 , 7 A.3d 404 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jarmon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113, 122 , 7 A.3d 404 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" Jaeger v. Connecticut Siting Council
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113, 122 , 7 A.3d 404 (2010) (“[w]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inadequate brief’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011). 2 According to the application, the tower would afford telecommunications coverage to Route 7 and portions of Route 112 and Route 126, along with local roads throughout southwest Canaan. 3 General Statutes § 4-183 (a) provides in relevant part: “A person who has exhausted all administrative remedies available within th…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Kiara Liz V.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Ed. 2d (2020); see, e.g., State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113 , 124–25, 7 A.3d 404 (2010) (Appellate Court will not engage in plain error analysis on basis of inadequate brief), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Perez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Murray, 254 Conn. 472, 478 , 757 A.2d 578 (2000).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mourning, 104 Conn. App. 262 , 266 n.1, 934 A.2d 263 , cert. denied, 285 Conn. 903 , 938 A.2d 594 (2007); see also State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113 , 118 n.7, 7 A.3d 404 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011); State v. Bereis, 117 Conn. App. 360, 364 , 978 A.2d 1122 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ciullo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113 , 118 n.7, 7 A.3d 404 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011); State v. Bereis, 117 Conn. App. 360, 364-65 , 978 A.2d 1122 (2009); see also State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 457 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Monahan, 125 Conn. App. 113, 122-23 , 7 A.3d 404 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 11 A.3d 152 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Edward Jevarjian
SC 18728.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 4, 2011.
11 A.3d 152
Frank J. Riccio and Lisa J. Steele, in support of the petition., Laurie N. Feldman, special deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 331 (AC 30485), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the judge issuing a search warrant made a scrivener’s error as to the time of execution?”

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.