green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction
See Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 624, 631 , 11 A.3d 160 (2010) (Beach, J., concurring and dissenting) (noting that habeas court’s use of phrase ‘‘with prejudice’’ may be ambiguous), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 908 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011). 11 In fact, the petitioner stated that he had an issue with one of the correc- tion officers accompanying him to the courtroom.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Pagan
See State v. Serrano, 123 Conn. App. 530, 544 , 1 A.3d 1277 (2010) (jury may infer that defendant intends natural conse- quences of voluntary conduct), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 909 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rose
(2×)
See State v. Claudio C., 125 Conn. App. 588, 598 , 11 A.3d 1086 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 910 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011); State v. Davis, 109 Conn. App. 187, 196 , 951 A.2d 31 , cert. denied, 289 Conn. 929 , 958 A.2d 160 (2008); State v. Stepney, 94 Conn. App. 72 , 79 n.2, 891 A.2d 67 , cert. denied, 278 Conn. 911 , 899 A.2d 40 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stepney v. Commissioner of Correction
See Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 641, 648 , 9 A.3d 402 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 910 , 12 A.3d 1006 (2011); Crocker v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 110, 131-32 , 10 A.3d 1079 , cert. denied, 300 Conn. 919 , 14 A.3d 333 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Robinson
(2×)
See State v. Claudio C., 125 Conn. App. 588, 598 , 11 A.3d 1086 (2010) (“The defendant can not raise a constitutional claim by attaching a constitutional label to a purely evidentiary *337 claim .... [0]nce identified, unpreserved evidentiary claims masquerading as constitutional claims will be summarily dismissed.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 910 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Wilder
See State v. Serrano, 123 Conn. App. 530, 542 , 1 A.3d 1277 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 909 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ramon A. G.
See, e.g., Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction, 125 Conn. App. 641, 647 , 9 A.3d 402 (2010) (‘‘[t]he petitioner’s counsel determined that, as a matter of trial strategy, presenting inconsistent, alternative defenses of intoxication and self-defense risked alie- nating the jury’’), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 910 , 12 A.3d 1006 (2011).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turner
See, e.g., State v. Serrano, 123 Conn. App. 530, 543 , 1 A.3d 1277 (2010), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 909 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Boutilier
(2×)
In re Lukas K., 120 Conn. App. 465, 472 , 992 A.2d 1142 (2010), aff'd, 300 Conn. 463 , 14 A.3d 990 (2011); see also State v. Claudio C., 125 Conn. App. 588, 598 , 11 A.3d 1086 (2010) (“[t]he defendant can not raise a constitutional claim by attaching a constitutional label to a purely evidentiary claim or by asserting merely that a strained connection exists between the evidentiary claim and a fundamental constitutional right” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 910 , 12 A.3d 1005 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Waterview Site Services, Inc.
v.
Pay Day, Inc.
v.
Pay Day, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 10, 2011.
Richard J. Buturla, in support of the petition., Todd H. Lampert, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn. App. 561 (AC 30982), is denied.
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.