green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction
See Figueroa v. Commissioner of Correction, 123 Conn. App. 862, 871 , 3 A.3d 202 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 926 , 12 A.3d 570 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
Sethi v. Yagildere
See Sethi v. Yagildere, 125 Conn. App. 902 , 10 A.3d 52 (2010), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 929 , 12 A.3d 570 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Alison M.
See State v. Jay, 124 Conn. App. 294 , 311 n.10, 4 A.3d 865 (2010), cert, denied, 299 Conn. 927 , 12 A.3d 571 (2011). 15 The grandmother conceded that the witnesses disclosed by the respondent should be permitted to testify as fact witnesses. 16 “hi the absence of any one of these conditions, the [respondent’s] claim will fail.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas Healey
v.
Hawkeye Construction, LLC, Et Al.
v.
Hawkeye Construction, LLC, Et Al.
SC 18730.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 13, 2011.
Robert K. Jahn, in support of the petition.
Eveleigh.
Published
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn. App. 215 (AC 30894), is granted, limited to the following issue:
[*928] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18730. Robert K. Jahn, in support of the petition. Decided January 13, 2011“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the formation of the employment contract in Connecticut provided sufficient basis for application of this state’s workers’ compensation laws?”
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.