green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Orellana v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Elsey v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 144, 154 , 10 A.3d 578 , cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morris v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See Elsey v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 144, 153 , 10 A.3d 578 , cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Indeed, ‘‘[a]ny . . . understanding or agree- ment between any state’s witness and the state police or state’s attorney clearly falls within the ambit of Brady principles.’’ Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 103 Conn. App. 493 ; see also Elsey v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 144, 152 , 10 A.3d 578 (same), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Indeed, ‘‘[a]ny . . . understanding or agree- ment between any state’s witness and the state police or state’s attorney clearly falls within the ambit of Brady principles.’’ Walker v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 103 Conn. App. 493 ; see also Elsey v. Commis- sioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 144, 152 , 10 A.3d 578 (same), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salmon v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See id. ; see also Elsey v. Commissioner of Correction , 126 Conn. App. 144 , 162, 10 A.3d 578 ("[b]ecause both prongs ... [of the Strickland test] must be established for a habeas petitioner to prevail, a court may dismiss a petitioner's claim if he fails to meet either prong" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kellman v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice ... that course should be followed." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Brown , 279 Conn. 493 , 525-26, 903 A.2d 169 (2006) ; see also Elsey v. Commissioner of Correction , 126 Conn. App. 144 , 162, 10 A.3d 578 , cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011) ("[b]ecause both prongs ... [of the Strickland test] must be established for a habeas petitioner to prevail, a court may dismiss a petitioner's claim if he fails to meet either prong" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morales
(2×)
State v. Willoughby , 153 Conn.App. 611 , 618, 102 A.3d 1118 (2014) (court not required to give contemporaneous limiting instruction on admissible hearsay statement); see also William C. v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn.App. 185 , 190, 10 A.3d 115 (court not required to give contemporaneous limiting instruction on constancy of accusation testimony), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Appellate review of claims not raised before the habeas court would amount to an ambuscade of the [habeas] judge.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Henderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 129 Conn. App. 188, 197-98 , 19 A.3d 705 (2011); see also Elsey v. Commissioner of Correction, 126 Conn. App. 144, 169-70 , 10 A.3d 578 (“ [t]his court is not compelled to consider issues neither alleged in the habeas petition nor considered at the habeas proceeding” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 300 Conn. 922 , 14 A.3d 1007 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gerald Marciano
v.
Neil W. Kraner Et Al.
v.
Neil W. Kraner Et Al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 16, 2011.
Zbigniew S. Rozbicki, in support of the petition., Timothy Brignole, in opposition.
Palmer.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 171 (AC 31090), is denied.
PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.