green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Global TelLink Corp. v. Department of Corrections
See, e.g., Garner v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 16 A.3d 1189, 1200 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011) (“[RJe-versible error requires the determination ‘must not only be erroneous, but also harmful or prejudicial to the complaining party.’ D.Z. v. Bethlehem Area School District, 2 A.3d 712, 726 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010)[, appeal denied, 612 Pa. 693 , 29 A.3d 798 (2011)]. '[A]n order of an administrative agency will not be disturbed for harmless error.' Id. at 725-26.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HERMAN DAVID PALMIERI AND SHARON F. PALMIERI, HIS WIFE, Petitioners
v.
GRANT LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FOREST CITY GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, WJB GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, BHKR GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LIBERTY CENTER VENTURE, A JOINT VENTURE, GRANT LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, OR ITS NOMINEE, AND AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY, T/D/B/A AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE T/D/B/A ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, Respondents
v.
GRANT LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, FOREST CITY GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, WJB GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, BHKR GRANT LIBERTY ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LIBERTY CENTER VENTURE, A JOINT VENTURE, GRANT LIBERTY DEVELOPMENT GROUP ASSOCIATES, A PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, OR ITS NOMINEE, AND AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY, T/D/B/A AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE T/D/B/A ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES, Respondents
115 WAL 2011.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 14, 2011.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 14th day of September 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.