green
Positive treatment
14.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Assn. v. Essaghof
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 407 , 1 A.3d 1238 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Al Dente, LLC v. Consiglio
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC , 123 Conn.App. 402 , 406, 1 A.3d 1238 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Robles
(2×)
See State v. Casiano , 122 Conn.App. 61 , 68, 998 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010) ; see also State v. Henderson , 130 Conn.App. 435 , 443, 24 A.3d 35 (2011) ("[i]t is clear that [i]n order for the court to have jurisdiction over a motion to correct an illegal sentence after the sentence has been executed, the sentencing proceeding, and not the trial leading to the conviction, must be the subject of the attack" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), appeals dismissed, 308 Conn. 702 , 66 A.3d 847 (2013) (certification improvidently granted).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Silva
(2×)
See State v. Fluker, 123 Conn.App. 355 , 363, 1 A.3d 1216 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jalbert v. Mulligan
(2×)
See Grasso v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc., 138 Conn. App. 759, 769 , 54 A.3d 221 (2012). ‘‘We do not reverse the judgment of a trial court on the basis of challenges to its rulings that have not been adequately briefed. . . . [A]ssignments of error which are merely mentioned but not briefed beyond a statement of the claim will be deemed abandoned and will not be reviewed by this court.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 406 , 1 A.3d 1238 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Absolute Plumbing & Heating, LLC v. Edelman
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 406 , 1 A.3d 1238 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rutka v. City of Meriden
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 406 , 1 A.3d 1238 (“for this court judiciously and efficiently to consider claims of error raised on appeal . . . the parties must clearly and fully set forth their arguments in their briefs” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Pattis
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Beef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 406 , 1 A.3d 1238 (“[f]or this court judiciously and efficiently to consider claims of error raised on appeal . . . the parties must clearly and fully set forth their arguments in their briefs” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
ARGENTINIS v. Fortuna
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 406 , 1 A.3d 1238 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carmichael v. Stonkus
(2×)
See Paoletta v. Anchor Reef Club at Branford, LLC, 123 Conn. App. 402, 407 , 1 A.3d 1238 (noting failure to comply with Practice Book § 67-4 [d] when defendant did not provide separate sections on standard of review), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lee-Riveras
(2×)
See State v. Fluker, 123 Conn. App. 355, 363 , 1 A.3d 1216 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jimenez
(2×)
See State v. Casiano, 122 Conn. App. 61, 71 , 998 A.2d 792 , cert, denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Syms
(2×)
This is because the defendant’s claim is not addressed to his sentence but, rather, to the court’s acceptance of his guilty plea. ‘‘In order for the court to have jurisdiction over a motion to correct an illegal sentence after the sentence has been executed, the sentencing proceeding, and not the [proceeding] leading to the conviction, must be the subject of the attack.’’ State v. Lawrence, 281 Conn. 147, 158 , 913 A.2d 428 (2007); see also State v. Casiano, 122 Conn. App. 61, 68 , 998 A.2d 792 (trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider motion to correct illegal sentence that was…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mukhtaar
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Casiano , 122 Conn.App. 61 , 66-67, 998 A.2d 792 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 931 , 5 A.3d 491 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Tavorus L. Fluker
v.
Tavorus L. Fluker
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 14, 2010.
Heather M. Wood, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Michael L. Regan, state’s attorney, in opposition.
Eveleigh.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn. App. 355 (AC 30638), is denied.
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
[*932] Heather M. Wood, deputy assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Michael L. Regan, state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 14, 2010