green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
SCHULTZ, DONALD v. EXCELSIOR ORTHOPAEDICS, LLP
Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 55 AD2d 597, 597 [1976]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conigliaro v. Franco
The Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) must be narrowly construed "and if liability is to be extended so as to impose liability upon the social host, it should be accomplished through the legislative process and not through the courts” (Gabrielle v Craft, 75 AD2d 939 , 940; see also, Edgar v Kajet, 55 AD2d 597 ; Kohler v Wray, 114 Misc 2d 856 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company
v.
Marie Russo
v.
Marie Russo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 6, 1976.
Published
In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals[*598] from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1976, which, inter alia, denied the application. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. Under the terms of the policy in question, contact with the hit-and-run vehicle is a condition precedent to arbitration. Under the conflicting proof presented, the issue of whether there was contact should be decided at a hearing, at which all of the relevant facts may be presented. Latham, Acting P. J., Damiani, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.