green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Young W. Kong
(3×)
Transp., 21 Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc. (In re Triple E Transp., Inc.), 169 B.R. 22 368, 373 (E.D.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Young W. Kong
(3×)
Transp., 21 Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc. (In re Triple E Transp., Inc.), 169 B.R. 22 368, 373 (E.D.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Utah v. Troff (In Re Troff)
Association, Inc. v. Clark (In re Clark), 222 B.R. 114, 118-119 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1997); Neff v. Knodle (In re Knodle), 187 B.R. 660, 662-664 (Bankr.D.N.D.1995); Clifford Elees., Inc. v. Prieto (In re Prieto), 169 B.R. 22, 24-25 (Bankr.D.N.J.1994); In re Sokol, 170 B.R. 556, 559 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1994), affirmed on other grounds, 181 B.R. 27 (S.D.N.Y.1995); Zajder v. Hills Dep’t Store (In re Zajder), 154 B.R. 885, 886-887 (Bankr.W.D.Pa. 1993); Thompson v. Lewis (In re Thompson), 77 B.R. 646, 647-648 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1987); cf. National Auto Sales, *99 Inc. v. Wilson (In re Wilson), 299 B.R. at 382…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Scarsdale Realty Partners, L.P.
See In re 680 5th Avenue Associates, 156 B.R. 726, 730-31 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd 169 B.R. 22 (S.D.N.Y.1993), aff'd 29 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re 680 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, Et Al., Debtors. 680 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, 54th and Fifth Land Partners, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
the MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION, Defendant-Appellee
v.
the MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION, Defendant-Appellee
93 Civ. 3402 (LBS).
District Court, S.D. New York.
Sep 30, 1993.
Sand.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
ORDER
SAND, District Judge.After full briefing and oral argument, we affirm the decision of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of Bankruptcy Judge Francis G. Conrad, 156 B.R. 726.
SO ORDERED.