green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ramirez
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 390 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985), quoting United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57, 69 , 105 S. Ct. 471 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Davis
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn.App. 374 , 489 A.2d 386, 392 (holding that a single instance of similar conduct does not constitute a pattern), certification denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985); Hodges v. State, 386 So.2d 888, 889 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1980) (same); Vaughn, 448 So.2d at 1267-68 (same); State v. Shoffner, 62 N.C.A.pp. 245, 302 S.E.2d 830, 833 (1983) (quoting State v. Fortney, 301 N.C. 31 , 269 S.E.2d 110, 116-17 (1980) and defining a pattern to include ac tions the victim “commonly” or “often” repeated); see also Jeffries v. Nix, 912 F.2d 982, 985, 987 (8th Cir.1990) …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kelley
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 380-82 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985), citing General Statutes § 54-86f (4) (noting that rape shield statute permits evidence of prior sexual conduct if it is “so relevant and material to a critical issue in the case that excluding it would violate the defendant’s constitutional rights”); Commonwealth v. Bohannon, 376 Mass. 90, 95 , 378 N.E.2d 987 (1978) (rape shield statute inapplicable to impeachment evidence of prior false allegations by complainant). 1 We recently noted that “[t]he sixth amendment to the …
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Christiano
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 380-81 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McDonough
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 379 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 380 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Clinkscales
“The constitutional standard for cross-examination is satisfied when defense counsel is allowed to expose to the jury facts from which the jurors could appropriately draw inferences as to the witness’ reliability.” State v. Butler, supra, 683-84 ; see also State v. Cassidy, 3 Conn. App. 374, 381 , 489 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 196 Conn. 803 , 492 A.2d 1239 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Stephen P. Cassidy III
v.
Stephen P. Cassidy III
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 24, 1985.
Richard T. Meehan, Jr., in support of the petition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 3 Conn. App. 374, is denied.