Miller v. Miller, 552 A.2d 430 (Conn. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Miller v. Miller, 552 A.2d 430 (Conn. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Douglas C. (Concurrence) (conn, 2023-01-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Douglas C. (Concurrence)
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222 , 228–32, 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222 , 228–32, 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thomas H.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222, 237 , 545 A.2d 1116 (“[t]his court will not impose a degree of certitude as to date, time and place that will render prosecutions of those who sexually abuse children impossible”), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 824, 552 A.2d 431 , 432 (1988).
cited Cited "see" Foster v. Foster
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Miller, 16 Conn. App. 412, 418 , 547 A.2d 922 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 430 (1988).
cited Cited "see" State v. Carneiro
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222, 237 , 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 824, 552 A.2d 431 , 432 (1988).
discussed Cited "see" Rome v. Album
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Miller, 16 Conn. App. 412, 415-16 , 547 A.2d 922 (holding that court acted without jurisdiction in substantively modifying existing lump sum alimony award pursuant to motion for clarification), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 430 (1988).
cited Cited "see" Butler v. Chapel Medical Group, No. Cv 95-0368687 S (Jan. 13, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Stowe v. McHugh , 46 Conn. App. 391 (1997) and Guzze v. New Britain Hospital , 16 Conn. App. 480 , 484-485 , cert. denied 209 Conn. 823 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Joseph V.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. September 30, 2019) (allowing course of conduct charging of criminal sexual penetration of minor), cert. denied, New Mexico Supreme Court, Docket No. S-1-SC-37991 (December 12, 2019); see also State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222 , 229–30, 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988). 4 The defense consistently argued that the two young men, the state’s primary witnesses, simply lacked credibility.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Joseph V.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. September 30, 2019) (allowing course of conduct charging of criminal sexual penetration of minor), cert. denied, New Mexico Supreme Court, Docket No. S-1-SC-37991 (December 12, 2019); see also State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222 , 229–30, 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988). 4 The defense consistently argued that the two young men, the state’s primary witnesses, simply lacked credibility.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Saraceno, 15 Conn. App. 222 , 225–27 and n.1, 545 A.2d 1116 (decided prior to recogni- tion of claims of unanimity as to instances of conduct, not deciding whether statute criminalized continuing course of conduct, and not applying any presumption in favor of prosecutorial discretion), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988); see also State v. Romero, 269 Conn. 481, 504 , 849 A.2d 760 (2004) (same); State v. Michael D., 153 Conn. App. 296 , 322, 101 A.3d 298 (same), cert. denied, 314 Conn. 951 , 103 A.3d 978…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Douglas C.
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Saraceno, supra, 15 Conn. App. 225–27 and n.1 (decided prior to recognition of claims of unanimity as to instances of conduct, not deciding whether statute criminalized continuing course of con- duct, and not applying any presumption in favor of prosecutorial discretion), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 431 (1988), and cert. denied, 209 Conn. 824 , 552 A.2d 432 (1988); see also State v. Romero, 269 Conn. 481, 504 , 849 A.2d 760 (2004) (same); State v. Michael D., 153 Conn. App. 296 , 322, 101 A.3d 298 (same), cert. denied, 314 Conn. 951 , 103 A.3d 978 (2014); State…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Denya
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Miller v. Miller, 16 Conn. App. 412, 415-16 , 547 A.2d 922 (substantive modification of lump sum alimony award deemed improper exercise of power to clarify), cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 , 552 A.2d 430 (1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rogelstad, No. Cr99-195673 S (Dec. 7, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
No separate civil action was brought." The court in Servello indicated that "[w]e are presented, then, with the question of whether the defendant's failure to bring a petition for a new trial in. a separate action deprived the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction to rule on the petition. . . . [T]he trial court should have dismissed the defendant's petition for a new trial because it was improperly brought. and we do not review the trial court's denial of that petition." Id., 101-102 ; see also State v. Saraceno , 15 Conn. App. 222 , 250-51 , 545 A.2d 1116 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 823 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bourquin v. Melsungen, No. Cv-88-0346322s (Jul. 19, 1993)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
"In bringing an action in medical malpractice, the plaintiff must present medical expert testimony to establish that the defendant's treatment and care fell short of the required standard and that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff's injury." Perez v. Mount Sinai Hospital, supra, 520 . "`In Connecticut, both breach of the standard of care and proximate cause must be proved by expert testimony." Id., quoting Campbell v. Pommier, 5 Conn. App. 29 , 32 , 496 A.2d 975 (1985). "[E]xpert testimony is necessary to establish the standard of proper professional skill or care on the part of a ph…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bourquin v. Melsungen, No. Cv-88-0346322s (Jul. 19, 1993)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
"In bringing an action in medical malpractice, the plaintiff must present medical expert testimony to establish that the defendant's treatment and care fell short of the required standard and that the breach proximately caused the plaintiff's injury." Perez v. Mount Sinai Hospital, supra, 520 . "`In Connecticut, both breach of the standard of care and proximate cause must be proved by expert testimony." Id., quoting Campbell v. Pommier, 5 Conn. App. 29 , 32 , 496 A.2d 975 (1985). "[E]xpert testimony is necessary to establish the standard of proper professional skill or care on the part of a ph…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Linda Miller
v.
Hugh Miller
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 1, 1988.
552 A.2d 430
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition., John E. Lee, in opposition.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 16 Conn. App. 412, is denied.