green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Presidential Capital Corp. v. Reale
(2×)
See Commissioner of Health Services v. Kadish, 17 Conn. App. 577 , 554 A.2d 1097 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 806 , 563 A.2d 1355 (1989) (reviewing order granting protective order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Mary's Hospital v. Brackett, No. Cv99-0152913s (Oct. 5, 2000)
(2×)
See, e.g., Commissioner of Health Services v. Kadish, 17 Conn. App. 577 , 578 , 554 A.2d 1097 , cert. denied, 212 Conn. 806 , 563 A.2d 1355 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sauvage v. City of Danbury, No. 321273 (Oct. 15, 1996)
CT Page 6225 (finding that a description of "Route 14A, Plainfield, Connecticut" without any further reference was patently defective where the road in question was over six miles long) with Lussier v. Department of Transportation, supra, 228 Conn. 345 (upholding trial court decision finding that notice of claim was not patently deficient regarding the location description where the notice described the location as "route 617 where the highway crosses the Shunock River" where the road was only three-tenths of a mile long); see also Schaap v. Meriden, 139 Conn. 254 , 257 , 93 A.2d 152 (1952) (d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Dexter P.
See Chesson v. Zoning commission, 157 Conn. 520, 527 , 254 A.2d 864 (1969); Donohue v. Zoning Board of Appeals, [ 155 Conn. 550, 554 , 235 A.2d 643 (1967)]; Winslow v. Zoning Board, [ 143 Conn. 381, 384 , 122 A.2d 789 (1956)]; Arrien v. Litchfield, 17 Conn. App. 320, 324 , 552 A.2d 445 (1989); see also Fidelity Trust Co. v. BVD Associates, [supra, 196 Conn. 278 ].” Ruotolo v. Inland Wetlands Agency, 18 Conn. App. 440, 448 , 558 A.2d 1021 , cert, denied, 212 Conn. 806 , 563 A.2d 1356 (1989); see Ghent v. Planning Commission, 219 Conn. 511 , 516 n.4, 594 A.2d 5 (1991); Yanni v. Del Ponte, 31 C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commissioner of Health Services
v.
Harold Kadish
v.
Harold Kadish
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 13, 1989.
R. Bartley Halloran, in support of the petition., Richard J. Lynch and Andrea B. Gaines, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 577, is denied.