green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Craig v. Mohyde, No. Cv94 031 60 56 S (Apr. 18, 1997)
Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc., 224 Conn. 563 , 569 , 620 A.2d 118 (1993) (construing the term "owner" under General Statutes § 49-34 , regarding mechanic's liens); Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC, 189 Conn. 212 , 218 , 455 A.2d 857 (1983) (holding that "[i]t is undisputed that a mortgagee in Connecticut, both by common-law rule and by statute, is deemed to have taken legal title upon the execution of a mortgage on real property."); Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163 , 166 , 565 A.2d 252 (1989), cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 91989) (holdin…
cited
Cited "see"
Bruno v. Whipple
See Triangle Contractors, Inc. v. Young, 20 Conn. App. 218, 221 , 565 A.2d 262 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 810 , 568 A.2d 795 (1989) (construing Practice Book § 412 (now § 18-5)).
cited
Cited "see"
Gibson v. Jefferson Woods Community, Inc.
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163 , 166–67, 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOS
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 167 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sargent v. Smith
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); see also Stein v. Hillebrand, 240 Conn. 35 , 43 n.7, 688 A.2d 1317 (1997); Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC, 189 Conn. 212, 218-19 , 455 A.2d 857 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Garvin
See State v. Blackwell, 20 Conn. App. 193, 195-96 , 565 A.2d 549 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 810 , 568 A.2d 794 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Connecticut National Bank v. L & R Realty
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); J.
cited
Cited "see"
Dime Savings Bank of New York v. Grisel
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Rothermel.
The rule that § 49-15 deprives an appellate tribunal of jurisdiction over an appeal in an action for strict foreclosure after the passage of the law day; see, e.g., Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 167 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); is rooted in concerns related to mootness, rather than the existence of a final judgment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vincent
The cases then indicate that when you find inadvertent evidence in plain view and they constitute the means or instrumentalities of a separate crime, they are evidence of another crime, they may be seized.” “The police need not be caught completely by surprise for a discovery to be inadvertent, so long as they did not anticipate the discovery or know in advance the location of the evidence and intent to seize it.” State v. Pepe, 176 Conn. 75, 79-80 , 405 A.2d 51 (1978); see also State v. Blackwell, 20 Conn. App. 193, 200 , 565 A.2d 549 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 810 , 568 A.2d 794 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hartford Federal Savings and Loan Association
v.
Stanley V. Tucker
v.
Stanley V. Tucker
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 1989.
Stanley V. Tucker, pro se, in support of the petitions.
Published
The defendant Stanley V. Tucker’s petitions for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 804, are denied.