green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Matey v. Estate of Dember
See Matey v. Waterbury, 24 Conn. App. 93 , 585 A.2d 1260 , cert. denied, 218 Conn. 908 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Matey v. Estate of Dember
See Matey v. Waterbury, 24 Conn. App. 93 , 585 A.2d 1260 , cert. denied, 218 Conn. 908 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Leszcynski, No. Cv96-0564251-S (Aug. 25, 2000)
Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp., 123 Conn. 166 , 193 A. 204 (1937), our Supreme Court noted that "unless [a voluntarily withdrawn case] is restored to the docket [the court] cannot proceed with it further but, the action still being in court, it has not gone entirely beyond the jurisdiction of the court to act in it." Id., 170 ; see also CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury, 239 Conn. 375 , 389 , 685 A.2d 1108 CT Page 9939 (1996). 3 Indeed, the court in Lusas went on to state that "[t]here is no reason why the court has not jurisdiction upon a proper showing to restore to the active doc…
cited
Cited "see"
Pitchell v. City of Hartford
See Matey v. Waterbury, 24 Conn. App. 93, 98 , 585 A.2d 1260 , cert. denied, 218 Conn. 908 , 588 A.2d 1383 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Ronald Moody
v.
Ronald Moody
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 18, 1991.
Christine Perra, in support of the petition., James A. Killen, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is dismissed.