State v. Mierez, 593 A.2d 136 (Conn. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Mierez, 593 A.2d 136 (Conn. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“sale' of an illegal drug is not limited to an exchange for value”
21 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Wassil (conn, 1995-05-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Wassil
Conn. · 1995 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
sale' of an illegal drug is not limited to an exchange for value
cited Cited "see" Davis v. Town of Westport
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mierez, 24 Conn. App. 543, 547 , 590 A.2d 469 , cert. denied, 219 Conn. 910 , 911, 593 A.2d 136 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Bill Butler Associates v. New England Savings Bank
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tedesco v. Stamford, 24 Conn. App. 377, 380 , 588 A.2d 656 , cert. granted, 219 Conn. 910 , 593 A.2d 1371 *202 (1991); Wertheim & Co. v. Halpert, 48 N.Y.2d 681 , 397 N.E.2d 386 , 421 N.Y.S.2d 877 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Theriault
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
The defendant’s argument is unavailing in light of our Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Wassil, 233 Conn. 174 , 658 A.2d 548 (1995). 9 In that case, the court reviewed the legislative history and concluded that, “under § 21a-240 (50), ‘any form of delivery’ of narcotics constitutes a ‘sale’ of narcotics, whether the delivery is also a ‘barter,'exchange or gift, or offer therefor.’ We thus read the statute as if it contained a comma after the word delivery: ‘ “[s]ale” is any delivery, which includes barter, exchange or gift or offer therefor ....’” Id., 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Renwrick Mierez
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 12, 1991.
593 A.2d 136
Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Dennis F. O’Toole, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 24 Conn. App. 543, is denied.