green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Dime Savings Bank v. Cornaglia
See Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 373 , 594 A.2d 493 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 914, 597 A.2d 339 (1991); D.
cited
Cited "see"
Curry v. Burns
Hutchinson v. Plante, 175 Conn. 1, 4 , 392 A.2d 488 (1978); see Suffield, Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 374-75 , 594 A.2d 493 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 914, 597 A.2d 339 , 340 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See State v. Lucci, 25 Conn. App. 334, 348 , 595 A.2d 361 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 336 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Canty
See State v. Lucci, 25 Conn. App. 334, 348 , 595 A.2d 361 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 336 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fernandez
See State v. Lucci, 25 Conn. App. 334, 342 , 595 A.2d 361 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 336 (1991) (right to fair trial does not require the admission of cumulative evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lorson
The plaintiff points out that foreclosure trials are entitled to priority by statute; see General Statutes § 52-192; see also, e.g., Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 373 , 594 A.2d 493 (‘‘due to the nature of foreclosure actions, the spirit of the rules is to expedite matters’’), cert. dismissed, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 339 (1991), and cert. denied, 220 Conn. 914 , 597 A.2d 340 (1991); and contends that, because the HUD regulations are so volu- minous and Byzantine, the position taken by the defen- dants and the amicus ‘‘would saddle mortgagees with a massive and compl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America, N.A. v. Chainani
See, e.g., Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn.App. 369 , 372-74, 594 A.2d 493 (challenge to amount of debt, unlike defense to liability, need not be disclosed prior to judgment hearing), cert. dismissed, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 339 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 914 , 597 A.2d 340 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barberino Realty and Development Corporation
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Farmington
v.
Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Farmington
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 19, 1991.
Palmer S. McGee, Jr., in support of the petition., Robert J. Reeve and William L. Wollenberg, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 392, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“When a zoning regulation requires a site plan showing the specific project proposed to be submitted with an application for a special permit, after approval of such a permit and site plan, must a later revision of the site plan conform to the zoning regulations for approval of such a special permit?”