green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jenkins
(2×)
See State v. Williams, 25 Conn. App. 456, 459-61 , 595 A.2d 895 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 916 , 597 A.2d 339 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Scarpiello
(2×)
Although we agree with the defendant that an instruction employing only a simple objective standard would not withstand constitutional challenge in isolation; see State v. Williams, 25 Conn. App. 456, 464 , 595 A.2d 895 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 916 , 597 A.2d 339 (1991); we are satisfied that from the facts of the case, the issues presented, and the charge as a whole, there is no reasonable possibility that the trial court’s instruction misled the jury to an improper verdict.
cited
Cited "see"
Dime Savings Bank v. Cornaglia
See Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 373 , 594 A.2d 493 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 914, 597 A.2d 339 (1991); D.
cited
Cited "see"
Curry v. Burns
Hutchinson v. Plante, 175 Conn. 1, 4 , 392 A.2d 488 (1978); see Suffield, Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 374-75 , 594 A.2d 493 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 913 , 914, 597 A.2d 339 , 340 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Lorson
The plaintiff points out that foreclosure trials are entitled to priority by statute; see General Statutes § 52-192; see also, e.g., Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn. App. 369, 373 , 594 A.2d 493 (‘‘due to the nature of foreclosure actions, the spirit of the rules is to expedite matters’’), cert. dismissed, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 339 (1991), and cert. denied, 220 Conn. 914 , 597 A.2d 340 (1991); and contends that, because the HUD regulations are so volu- minous and Byzantine, the position taken by the defen- dants and the amicus ‘‘would saddle mortgagees with a massive and compl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bank of America, N.A. v. Chainani
See, e.g., Suffield Bank v. Berman, 25 Conn.App. 369 , 372-74, 594 A.2d 493 (challenge to amount of debt, unlike defense to liability, need not be disclosed prior to judgment hearing), cert. dismissed, 220 Conn. 913 , 597 A.2d 339 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 914 , 597 A.2d 340 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fernandez
(2×)
See also State v. Williams, 25 Conn. App. 456, 458-60 , 595 A.2d 895 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 916 , 597 A.2d 339 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Finley Williams
v.
Finley Williams
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 19, 1991.
Erskine D. McIntosh, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Frederick W. Fawcett, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 456, is denied.