Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc., 625 A.2d 1377 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc., 625 A.2d 1377 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Huckabee (connappct, 1996-06-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Huckabee
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vilalastra, 207 Conn. 35, 46 , 540 A.2d 42 (1988).’ State v. Ulen, 31 Conn. App. 20, 37 , 623 A.2d 70 , cert. denied, . 226 Conn. 905 , 625 A.2d 1378 (1993).” State v. Webb, 37 Conn. App. 722, 730 , 657 A.2d 711 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 915 , 660 A.2d 357 (1995). “[T]he failure of the . trial court to give a limiting instruction concerning the use of evidence of prior misconduct is not a matter of constitutional magnitude.” State v. Ulen, supra, 37 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ahern, No. Crnh 9106-1197 (Mar. 13, 1996)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ulen , 31 Conn. App. 20 , 35 , 623 A.2d 70 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905 , 625 A.2d 1378 (1993); State v. Marra , 222 Conn. 506 , 536 n. 16, 610 A.2d 1113 (1992); State v. Rumore , 28 Conn. App. 402 , 410-11 , 613 A.2d 1328 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 906 , 615 A.2d 1049 (1992); ; Esaw v. Friedman , 217 Conn. 553 , 554 n. 1, 586 A.2d 1164 (1991).
cited Cited "see" State v. Webb
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vilalastra, 207 Conn. 35, 46 , 540 A.2d 42 (1988).” State v. Ulen, 31 Conn. App. 20, 37 , 623 A.2d 70 , cert. denied, 226 Conn. 905 , 625 A.2d 1378 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The Ponds Homeowners Association, Inc.
v.
The Ponds, Inc., of Hotchkiss Grove
SC 14783.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 26, 1993.
625 A.2d 1377
Thomas E. Crosby, in support of the petition., Richard F. Connors, in opposition.
Published

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 919 (AC 11342), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the defendant The Ponds, Inc., fraudulently transferred, without consideration, certain condominium units to the individual codefendants (and Pomeroy Properties) where the only evidence in support were Real Estate Conveyance tax forms which were rebutted by evidence of a note and mortgage?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the individual defendants breached their May 11, 1989 agreement contrary to the statements of plaintiff’s counsel that he was not pursuing defendants under the counts of the complaint pertaining to that agreement and contrary to the evidence?”