State v. Allen, 635 A.2d 1231 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Allen, 635 A.2d 1231 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“cases have emphasized that to be admissible as substantive evidence, a prior inconsistent statement must have been made under circumstances that reasonably ensured reliability and trustworthiness”
11 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. McDougal (conn, 1997-07-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. McDougal
Conn. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
cases have emphasized that to be admissible as substantive evidence, a prior inconsistent statement must have been made under circumstances that reasonably ensured reliability and trustworthiness
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
William A. Allen, Jr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 3, 1993.
635 A.2d 1231
Nancy A. Freedman, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Rita M. Shair, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)

Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 908 (AC 11513), is denied.

Dissent

Berdon, J.,

dissenting.

I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification.