green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Stephan H., (Aug. 23, 2002)
"Where testimony is conflicting the trier may choose to believe one version over the other . . . as the probative force of the evidence is for the trier to determine." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, 245 Conn. 301 , 318 , 715 A.2d1 (1998); see also State v. Vargas, 34 Conn. App. 492 , 498 , 642 A.2d 47 , cert. denied, 230 Conn. 907 , 644 A.2d 921 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conway v. Travelers Casualty, No. Cv99-0588119 (Dec. 15, 2000)
Where testimony is conflicting the trier may choose to believe one version over the other . . . as the probative force of the evidence is for the trier to determine." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago , 245 Conn. 301 , 318 , 715 A.2d 1 (1998); see also State v. Vargas , 34 Conn. App. 492 , 498 , 642 A.2d 47 , cert. denied, 230 Conn. 907 , 644 A.2d 921 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrington v. Grillo, No. Cv98-0579272-S (Nov. 20, 2000)
CT Page 14936 . . as the probative force of the evidence is for the trier to determine." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago , 245 Conn. 301 , 318 , 715 A.2d 1 (1998); see also State v. Vargas , 34 Conn. App. 492 , 498 , 642 A.2d 47 , cert. denied, 230 Conn. 907 , 644 A.2d 921 (1994); Jacques All Trades Corporation v. Brown , 42 Conn. App. 124 , 129 , 689 A.2d 27 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. Bell, No. Cv-97-0569389 (Jun. 30, 2000)
"The question of the credibility of witnesses is for the trier to determine Where testimony is conflicting the trier may choose to believe one version over the other . . . as the probative force of the evidence is for the trier to determine." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago , 245 Conn. 301 , 318 , 715 A.2d 1 (1998); see also State v. Vargas , 34 Conn. App. 492 , 498 , 642 A.2d 47 , cert. denied, 230 Conn. 907 , 644 A.2d 921 (1994).
William H. Wilson
v.
Department of Public Utility Control
v.
Department of Public Utility Control
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 7, 1994.
Lawrence J. Kiel, in support of the petition., Tatiana D. Sypko, assistant attorney general, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 918 (AC 11959), is denied.