green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.2 score
“a charging order is neither fish nor fowl. it is neither an assignment nor attachment ... replaee levies of execution as the remedy for reaching the interest of a partner ... foreclosure is one of the orders available to charging creditors.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Salgado
a unanimous determination of guilty precludes the jury from proceeding to any lesser included offense
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
O'Neil v. Miller (In Re Bridgeman)
a charging order is neither fish nor fowl. it is neither an assignment nor attachment ... replaee levies of execution as the remedy for reaching the interest of a partner ... foreclosure is one of the orders available to charging creditors.
cited
Cited "see"
Burton v. Dimyan
See P&L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp., 35 Conn. App. 46, 50 , 643 A.2d 1302 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 913 , 648 A.2d 155 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crump v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Bagley, 35 Conn. App. 138, 139 , 644 A.2d 386 , cert. denied, 231 Conn. 913 , 648 A.2d 157 (1994). 3 In a subsequent proceeding, the petitioner was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder, attempt to commit murder and carrying a pistol without a permit.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Madison Hills Limited Partnership II
v.
Madison Hills, Inc.
v.
Madison Hills, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 14, 1994.
Susan C. Webb, in support of the petition., Edwin L. Doernberger, in opposition.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1) · D. Connecticut (1)
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn. App. 81 (AC 12278), is denied.